Comparison of Standard ACL Reconstruction Versus TARS-Augmented Reconstruction
NCT07418476 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2026-07-14
Summary
This study is designed to compare standard anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring autograft with ACL reconstruction augmented using the Tape Active Reconstruction System (TARS). Eligible patients aged 18 to 44 years with a complete ACL rupture will be prospectively enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two study groups. Participants will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at regular follow-up visits, with the final assessment performed at 12 months after surgery. Outcome assessments will include patient-reported outcome measures, objective clinical examination of knee stability, instrumented laxity measurements, and radiological evaluation.
Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL)
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
ACL Reconstruction
ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus tendon autograft
- PROCEDURE
-
TARS-Augmented ACL Reconstruction
Arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction using a quadrupled semitendinosus tendon autograft was performed with additional Tape Active Reconstruction System (TARS) augmentation. High-strength suture tape was applied to provide load sharing during early rehabilitation. The postoperative rehabilitation protocol was identical to the control group.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Samsun University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2027-07-01
- Completion
- 2027-07-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Long Term Clinical and Radiographical Outcomes of Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques
NCT05088278 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Compare Two Techniques for the Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
NCT03746470 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Rehabilitation After Fast-track Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01329081 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Risk of Serious Adverse Events Following Unsupervised vs Supervised Rehabilitation After Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07067060 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05992064 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament - A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Two Surgery Technics
NCT02180685 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture; RecOnsTruction Or Repair?
NCT02310854 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of Standard Versus Barbed Sutures in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
NCT01320371 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Functional Outcome Comparison of Implant-Free Bone-Patellar Tendon Autograft in Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction
NCT04123834 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Comparison of Anatomically Aligned and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients
NCT04181216 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Early Versus Delay Reconstruction in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tearing
NCT01580722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament With Short Hamstring Graft Compare With a Standard Hamstring Graft Technique
NCT03954925 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fixed Versus Adjustable Loop in ACL Reconstruction
NCT03184922 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Stereoradiological Comparison of the Results After Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Inserted With or Without the Use of a Tourniquet
NCT01488175 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Outcome and Tunnel Widening After ACL Reconstruction: Comparison of Aperture and Cortical Fixation
NCT01755819 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Follow-up After ACL Reconstruction
NCT01607437 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transphyseal Vs. Physeal Sparing ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Risk of Subsequent Lower Extremity Growth Deformity
NCT03081026 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Effect of the Web-Based Gamified Application on Functional Results and Recovery Conditions
NCT07053241 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ALL Reconstruction Versus Modified Lemaire's LET in Combination With ACL Reconstruction With a Minimum Follow up of 2 Years
NCT06147427 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Multiradius and Singleradius Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04364971 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Need for Compression Bandage Following Total Knee Arthroplasty A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Conducted in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Replacements
NCT03521869 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Assistance for Tunnel Positioning in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT04183803 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Functional Outcomes at Least 2 Years After Hamstring Muscle Repair
NCT04867746 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Muscle Function in Elderly Postoperative Patients
NCT00559780 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compression Bandage in Local Infiltration Analgesia Afte Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT00485212 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4