Immediate and 1-week Efficacy of a Single Session of Sciatic Nerve Electrical Stimulation in the Management of Low-back Related Leg Pain
NCT07377357 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 88
Last updated 2026-05-14
Summary
This clinical study focuses on people who experience long-term low-back related leg pain (commonly called sciatica). This type of pain is often associated with nerve irritation or compression in the lower spine and can cause symptoms like shooting or burning pain, tingling, numbness, or weakness in the leg. Many patients continue to suffer from this problem for months or years, and available treatments (including painkillers, anti-inflammatory drugs, or even surgery) do not always provide lasting relief. Because of this, there is a strong need to explore safe, non-drug, non-surgical therapies. The purpose of this study is to test the immediate and short-term efficacy and safety of a single session of a treatment called Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS) when applied near the sciatic nerve, the large nerve that runs from the lower back through the buttock and down the leg. PENS uses very thin sterile needles inserted under ultrasound guidance next to the nerve. A gentle electrical current is then applied for about 30 minutes to stimulate the nerve in a controlled way. This may help calm down nerve sensitivity, reduce inflammation, and decrease pain. The investigators will compare PENS with three other options: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): A commonly used therapy where mild electrical stimulation is applied through adhesive patches placed on the skin; Dry needling without electrical current: Thin needles are inserted under ultrasound guidance but no current is applied; and placebo treatment: A simulated version of the therapy with no active current, designed to look and feel similar so that participants do not know which treatment they are receiving. The study is designed as a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, which means that participants are assigned to one of the four groups by chance (like flipping a coin), and neither the patients nor the therapists who collect the measurements will know which treatment has been given. This design ensures fairness and reliability of the results. The investigators will measure: Back and leg pain levels, using a simple 0-10 scale; Disability, meaning how much the pain limits daily activities, measured with a well-known questionnaire; Quality of life, both physical and mental health aspects; Nerve-related pain features, like burning or electric-like sensations; Flexibility and movement, through the Straight Leg Raise test; Sensitivity to pressure and nerve stiffness, using ultrasound elastography, which is a safe imaging technique; and patients' global impression of improvement and any side effects. Assessments will take place before and immediately after the treatment session and after 1 week, allowing the investigators to see both the immediate and short-term effects. Safety considerations: Previous research shows that PENS and similar techniques are generally very safe. The most common side effects are mild and short-lasting, including temporary soreness, heaviness in the leg, or a small bruise. Serious complications are extremely rare. To minimize risks, all procedures will be carried out by experienced physiotherapists, using real-time ultrasound to guide needle placement and ensure accuracy. Only sterile, single-use needles are employed. By comparing PENS, TENS, dry needling, and placebo, this study seeks to determine whether a single session of PENS provides superior benefits in reducing pain, improving function, and enhancing quality of life for patients with sciatica-type low back pain. If successful, this treatment could become a valuable alternative to drugs or surgery, offering patients a safe and effective therapy to better manage their condition and regain daily function.
Conditions
- Sciatica
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Participants will receive real ultrasound-guided dry needle insertion (0.30 mm × 60 mm and 0.30 mm ×50 mm) to the perineural region adjacent to the sciatic nerve at both the subgluteal fold and the posterior thigh (junction between the middle and distal thirds). Electrical stimulation will be applied using the Endomed 484® electrotherapy unit (PRIM Physio, Madrid, Spain) in continuous biphasic mode at low frequency (2 Hz), 250 μs pulse width for 30 minutes. Intensity will be adjusted to elicit a visible, mild muscle contraction.
- PROCEDURE
-
Placebo Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Adhesive electrodes will be placed near the intervention site (sciatic nerve between the subgluteal fold and the distal third of the thigh) but connected to a disabled channel to simulate placebo TENS.
- PROCEDURE
-
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Participants will receive real superficial electrical stimulation via adhesive electrodes connected to the Endomed 484® unit, configured for TENS (non-invasive). Parameters will include continuous biphasic current, 2 Hz, 250 μs, 30 min, producing a clear sensory perception and mild muscle contraction.
- PROCEDURE
-
Placebo Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
A sham ultrasound-guided dry needling procedure will be performed using Streitberger placebo needles, which contact the skin superficially without penetration. Cables for PENS will be placed on the skin but connected to a disabled channel to simulate placebo PENS.
- PROCEDURE
-
Real Dry Needling (without Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation)
Participants will receive real ultrasound-guided dry needling but without electrical stimulation. The needles will remain in place for 30 minutes, with the PENS channel disabled to act as placebo.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Colegio de Fisioterapeutas de la Comunidad de Madrid
collaborator OTHER -
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-05-13
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-31
- Completion
- 2027-11-30
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Neuromodulation vs. Electrolysis in Plantar Fasciitis
NCT05826301 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of NMP and TDCS vs Pharmacological Treatment in Cancer Patients With Lower Limb Pain
NCT06240377 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Meralgia Paresthetica
NCT07335822 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Subacute and Early Chronic Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle Injuries
NCT06713200 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sciatic Nerve Stiffness Using Two-Sequences of Lower Limb Neurodynamic Testing: A Shear Wave Elastography Study
NCT07136441 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation on Peripheral Blood Flow
NCT07354607 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of a Session of Analgesic Electrostimulation (Invasive and Non-invasive) Applied to the Quadriceps Muscle in Patients After Knee Surgery.
NCT06910150 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Modes of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Chronic Neuropathic Radiculalgia
NCT04169477 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of High Frequency Electrical Currents in Healthy Subjects.
NCT02837458 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Shockwave Therapy on Post-laminectomy Fibrosis Low Back Pain Patients.
NCT05887024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
High Tone Power Therapy on Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Patients
NCT07305792 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of NMES+ on Hamstring Lesion (3a/3b)
NCT05786300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of High and Low Intensity Percutaneous Electrolysis for the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT04390438 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Electromagnetic Field in Lumbar Disc Prolapse Patients
NCT05559723 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transcutaneous Electrostimulation for Intermittent Claudication Supervised Walking Therapy for Intermittent cLAudication
NCT03512912 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Effectiveness of of Therapeutic Currents in Clinical Dimension and Penetration Depth Dimension in Lower Back
NCT02384785 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Lumbar Segmental Stabilization and TENS in Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT01640431 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Lower Leg Heating and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Exercise Capacity in Patients With PAD
NCT03462472 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Pain of Predominantly Peripheral Neuropathic Origin
NCT00716326 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Direct Current Electrical Stimulation on Treatment of Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
NCT06421558 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Depolarising Electrical Skin Stimulation in Neuropathic and Postoperative Pain
NCT03037684 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Conditioning Electrical Stimulation to Improve Outcomes in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
NCT05395715 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous High Frequency Alternating Current Stimulation in Healthy Volunteers
NCT04346719 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation on Radial Nerve in Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia
NCT03856125 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trigger Point Dry Needling With and Without Electrical Stimulation in Healthy Subjects
NCT07384247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA