Incentive Spirometry Versus Inspiratory Muscle Training After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

NCT07367945 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 45

Last updated 2026-01-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study will be conducted to compare between incentive spirometry verses inspiratory muscle training preoperatively on (ABG) after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Is there any significant difference of preoperative incentive spirometry verses inspiratory muscle training on Arterial blood gases (ABG) after coronary artery bypass graft surgery?

Participants will:

Group A (incentive spirometry group ) Group B (Inspiratory muscle trainer group ) for 5 days before operative Group C (control group) and group a , b will have routinely postoperative

Conditions

  • Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)

Interventions

DEVICE

Incentive spirometry

This group will include 15 patients, Incentive spirometry was utilized by the patient with ten breaths, six sets per day for a period of 10 min within patient tolerance in every session for five days with routinely physical therapy program (education and explanation) preoperatively, And postoperatively treatment (breathing treatment, deep-breathing applications, guided coughing, early mobilization).

DEVICE

Inspiratory muscle trainer

This group will include 15 patients, each session consisted of 30 minutes of inspiratory muscle training. The patients were trained to use an inspiratory threshold-loading device (Threshold Inspiratory Muscle Training) for five days with routinely physical therapy program (education and explanation) preoperatively, And postoperatively treatment (breathing treatment, deep-breathing applications, guided coughing, early mobilization).

OTHER

Routine physical therapy

15 patients will receive for 5 days routinely physical therapy program (education and explanation) preoperatively, And postoperatively treatment (breathing treatment, deep-breathing applications, guided coughing, early mobilization).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-02-01
Primary Completion
2027-02-01
Completion
2027-03-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07367945 on ClinicalTrials.gov