ProLARS Trial: Prospective Longitudinal Follow-up of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) and COREFO Score After Rectum Surgery in Patients Undergoing Upfront Surgery or Different Neo-adjuvant Treatment Regimens

NCT07339904 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2026-01-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

OBJECTIVE Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a term for functional bowel complaints occurring after low anterior resection. Symptoms can range from faecal incontinence and frequent loose stools to urgency and incomplete emptying with great impact on quality of life. Little is known about the longitudinal evolution of LARS and the impact of different schedules of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery.

The investigators aim to investigate the incidence and evolution of functional bowel complaints in function of different neoadjuvant treatment regimens, type of surgery and adjuvant therapy in patients who undergo surgery for rectal cancer. The investigators focus on following objectives: evolution of LARS- and COREFO-scores per treatment regimen and their impact on work incapacity; identification of possible risk factors potentially related to functional outcome; monitoring and treatment of LARS.

METHODS This will be a multicentre prospective interventional study. The study population will consist of adult patients with rectal cancer, regardless of any neo-adjuvant therapy. Patients will be included for 5 years with a 2 year postoperative follow-up. Interim analysis will be made after 2 years of inclusion. Patients with intellectual disability or clinical colon obstruction are excluded. Automated online questionnaires including LARS and COREFO scores, incapacity for work and defecation quality will be sent at different time points (figure 1) using REDCap.

RESULTS and CONCLUSIONS Longitudinal change of LARS- and COREFO-scores will be visually summarized. Patient, disease or procedure specific risk factors will be assessed as well.

LARS is proven to be the principal postoperative problem after rectal surgery. If the investigators can predict the severity of LARS (minor or major LARS), this can be extremely helpful in deciding whether to perform a sphincter-sparing resection or a rectal amputation instead. Furthermore, the investigators want to offer perspective to patients who are susceptible to a disturbed postoperative bowel function.

Conditions

  • Rectal Adenocarcinoma
  • LARS - Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
  • Rectal Resection
  • Low Anterior Resection
  • Total Mesorectal Excision

Interventions

OTHER

Questionnaire

Online questionnaire regarding LARS- and COREFO-scores, quality of defecation process, incapacity for work and initiation of treatment for potential LARS at different moments in time

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Antwerp

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Niels Komen, MD PhD · University Hospital, Antwerp

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SEQUENTIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-08-26
Primary Completion
2029-08-31
Completion
2029-08-31

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07339904 on ClinicalTrials.gov