Comparison of Conventional and Short Submucosal Tunnel Techniques in Type II Achalasia

NCT07325071 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 636

Last updated 2026-01-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Rationale for This Study The primary rationale for this study is to evaluate whether a shorter submucosal tunnel during POEM with an EGJ-focused myotomy in type II Achalasia cardia patients, provides equivalent or superior symptom relief compared to the conventional approach while minimizing adverse events such as GERD \& blown out myotomy and decreasing the procedure time.

Objectives

Primary Objective:

To compare the incidence of GERD (with manual review) at 3 and 12 months' post-procedure between conventional POEM and two experimental short-tunnel POEM techniques in patients with Type II achalasia.

Secondary Objectives:

To evaluate

1. Clinical success based on Eckardt score
2. Operating total procedure time
3. Use of Acid Suppressants on Follow up at 1 year
4. Severity of Esophagitis at 3 months
5. Intraoperative \& Postoperative adverse events (AGREE classification),
6. GERD-HRQL (0-18) scores 3 \& 12 Months
7. (Clinically relevant GORD was defined as excessive oesophageal /AET associated with a GERDQ score \>7 and/or with any grade of reflux oesophagitis).
8. Duration of Hospital stay
9. Quality of life (SF36)

Conditions

  • Esophageal Diseases

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Arm A - Conventional POEM (Control Arm)

Arm A - Conventional POEM (Control Arm) * Tunnel Length: 10-12 cm submucosal tunnel, extending from 10 cm proximal to the EGJ into the proximal stomach. * Myotomy: * Esophageal segment: 6-8 cm * Gastric segment: 2 cm * Myotomy orientation: posterior (5-6 o'clock position) * Depth: selective circular myotomy in Esophageal segment, full-thickness at LES and gastric side

PROCEDURE

Arm B - Standard Tunnel with EGJ complex-only Myotomy

* Tunnel Length: 10-12 cm submucosal tunnel to allow full-length inspection and safe scope manipulation. * Myotomy: * Esophageal: 2 cm proximal to EGJ * Gastric: 2 cm distal to EGJ * Purpose: limit disruption of Esophageal muscle above EGJ while retaining effective LES division * Myotomy is confined to the EGJ complex while still using a standard tunnel * Full-thickness myotomy may be used at the EGJ for consistency

PROCEDURE

Arm C - Ultra-short Tunnel POEM with EGJ complex -only Myotomy

* Tunnel Length: Approximately 4 cm, just enough to reach the EGJ complex and enable targeted dissection * Myotomy: * Esophageal: 2 cm * Gastric: 2 cm * Only the EGJ segment is divided, minimising disruption of proximal Esophageal musculature * Myotomy is performed selectively along the posterior axis (5-6 o'clock) Intraoperative Assessment and Quality Control * Adequacy of gastric extension is confirmed with visualisation of retroflexed scope or via second scope trans illumination when needed. * Any bleeding is controlled with coagulation graspers or cautery. * Tunnelling is performed closely along the Muscularis propria to minimise mucosal injury. * The scope is periodically withdrawn for mucosal inspection during the procedure.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dr.Mohan Kumar Ramchandani, MD, DM · AIG Hospitals

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-12-31
Primary Completion
2027-06-20
Completion
2027-07-30

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07325071 on ClinicalTrials.gov