MedTrace Logo

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Methods in the Treatment of Skin Wounds

NCT07323615 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 98

Last updated 2026-01-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study will compare the experimental group (debridement assisted by surgical microscope + VSD) and the control group (debridement under naked-eye observation + VSD) in terms of the rate of change in BWAT scores at one week postoperatively when the VSD is removed, daily wound negative-pressure drainage volume and pain scores within the first postoperative week, and results of two wound bacterial cultures. The study aims to scientifically evaluate the difference in efficacy between microscope-assisted debridement and naked-eye debridement, with the goal of providing a reference for the clinical debridement treatment of skin wounds.

Conditions

  • Wound Debridement

Interventions

DEVICE

microscopic

debridement with surgical microscope

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
99 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-12-16
Primary Completion
2026-12-31
Completion
2027-01-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07323615 on ClinicalTrials.gov