Comparative Outcomes of Damon Ultima vs Pitts 21 Pro Bracket Systems
NCT07318623 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2026-05-04
Summary
Title Comparative Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes between Damon Ultima and Pitts 21 Pro Bracket Systems; A Randomized Clinical Trial Abstract Background: The primary advantages of self-ligation brackets include faster archwire removal and ligation, reduced or eliminated need for chairside assistance, secure archwire engagement, and lower bracket-archwire friction, which collectively contribute to a substantial reduction in resistance to sliding and are theorized to enhance the efficiency of initial tooth alignment. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to assess differences in treatment outcomes with these two different self-ligation bracket systems.
Subjects/Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 40 participants with full permanent dentition (excluding third molars) exhibiting Angle Class I malocclusion with moderate crowding. Patients who were scheduled to undergo orthodontic treatment were allocated into two groups: Damon Ultima and Pitts 21 Pro. The total treatment duration will be measured in months from the bonding day to the completion of treatment, in addition to the number of visits.
Pre-treatment, post-alignment, and post-treatment records were obtained, including intraoral scans (IOS) for assessing alignment efficiency and arch parameters. Periapical radiographs of the upper and lower incisors were taken before and after treatment to measure the amount of root resorption. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) grading system. Additionally, pain perception and patient treatment perception were assessed.
Conditions
- Orthodentic Appliances
- Orthodontic Pathological Resorption of External Root
- Orthodontic Pain
- Orthodontic Brackets
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Treatment outcome of Damon ultima
To compare treatment outcome including duration, root resorption, arch dimension, pain and quality of finishing
- DEVICE
-
Treatment outcome of pitt21 pro
To compare treatment outcome including duration, root resorption, arch dimension, pain and quality of finishing
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Baghdad
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Hussain Jabar · University of Baghdad
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 15 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2027-12-31
- Completion
- 2028-03-31
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Iraq
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effectiveness of Insignia ™ Versus Standard Orthodontic Treatment With Damon Q Brackets
NCT01268852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Between Two Different Types of Orthodontic Appliances
NCT06401382 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Whether Self Ligating Brackets or Conventional Brackets Are Better for Treating Bimaxillary Proclination
NCT04001816 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort and Acceptance During the Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
NCT03976635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain Control During Braces Removal Using Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and High-Frequency Vibration
NCT07293975 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Methods That Reduce Pain During Debonding Fixed Orthodontic Appliance
NCT05904587 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pain and Discomfort With Anterior Versus Posterior Builds-up
NCT04105127 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescents With Crowding and Displaced Teeth
NCT05664282 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Myofunctional Appliances
NCT05371691 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoral Device vs Facial Mask for Class III Treatment
NCT04387175 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment Outcome of Clear Aligner and Traditional Fixed Appliances in Four Premolar Extraction Cases
NCT07236775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Crowding Without Extraction Using Self Ligating Brackets
NCT02996292 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial and Periodontal Changes Associated With Conventional Versus Self Ligating Brackets
NCT02436525 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Self-ligating Brackets Plus Minor Surgery in Treating Crowded Cases of Malocclusion
NCT03647241 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effectiveness of Acupressure in Relieving Orthodontic Pain
NCT06812936 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Patient-related Outcomes When Accelerating Upper Canine Retraction With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances
NCT06875037 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Oral Health Related Quality of Life Changes Between Clear Aligners and Vestibular Fixed Appliances
NCT04866238 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of a New Esthetic, Self-ligating Orthodontic Bracket
NCT02959671 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Orthodontic Aligning Archwire Materials
NCT04090931 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance
NCT03354442 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction Using Combined Retention Protocol
NCT06502886 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed vs. Milled Occlusal Splints in Dentistry
NCT07236294 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Labial Alveolar Bone Thickness and Apical Root Resorption Changes Associated With Self-ligating Versus Conventional Brackets
NCT02816489 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Laser Application in Pain Management Following the Use of Orthodontic Elastomeric Separators
NCT02209818 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Self-reported and Experimental Pain in Patients Undergoing Orthodontic Treatment
NCT06426238 ·Status: COMPLETED