Effects of Electrical Muscle Stimulation on Myofascial Pain Syndrome

NCT07315776 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 65

Last updated 2026-01-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) combined with Active Stretching (AS) (EMS+AS) and EMS+AS combined with Trigger Point Pressure Release (TPR) (EMS+AS+TPR) are effective treatments for Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) in working adults. The study will also assess the safety of the EMS+AS intervention. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do EMS+AS and EMS+AS+TPR lead to greater pain reduction, increased pressure pain threshold, and improved surface electromyography (sEMG) activity when compared to standard treatments? Furthermore, what is the participant feedback regarding EMS+AS and other treatments?

Researchers will compare EMS+AS to passive stretching (PS) and TPR to see if EMS+AS and EMS+AS+TPR are effective in treating myofascial trigger points in the trapezius muscle.

Participants will receive seven interventions across a single visit, including PS, EMS+AS, TPR, TPR combined with AS (TPR+AS), EMS+AS+TPR, Sham stimulation, and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS). Each treatment will consist of three 10-second sets with a 10-second rest between sets, and a 2-minute break provided between different treatments. Participants will have measurements taken on changes in pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, and sEMG activity during trapezius action pre- and post-treatment. Additionally, participants will report personal information, previous MPS treatments, and baseline health status, and provide feedback on satisfaction, treatment preferences, exercise knowledge for MPS prevention, and qualitative comments. For supplementary data, we selected only the EMS+AS and TPR interventions with the same protocol to evaluate changes in range of motion and changes in trigger point size and trapezius thickness (both at rest and during stretching) via ultrasound imaging.

Conditions

  • Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS)

Interventions

OTHER

Therapist-assisted Passive stretching (PS)

The therapist stretched the upper trapezius muscle via shoulder depression and neck deviation. The middle trapezius muscle was stretched using scapular protraction while simultaneously stabilizing the mid-spine and gently pulling the arm inward.

OTHER

The two-combination of EMS+AS

Electrical Muscle Stimulation combined with Active Stretching: The EMS component utilized parameters of 20 Hz frequency and 100 µs pulse width, with the amplitude adjusted individually for intensity. The EMS electrodes were placed across the muscle fibers with a 1 cm inter-electrode distance. This placement was specifically designed to restrict the electrical field, thereby inducing a local muscle contraction that opposes the direction of the active stretch being performed concurrently.

OTHER

Trigger point pressure release (TPR)

Trigger point Pressure Release (TPR): The therapist utilized a PAIN TEST™ FPX series pressure gauge (Wagner Instruments). A round rubber 1 cm2 force gauge probe was applied directly on the MTP by gradually increasing the pressure until the participant reached their maximum pressure tolerance level.

OTHER

Trigger point pressure release combined with active stretching (TPR+AS)

Trigger point Pressure Release combined with Active Stretching (TPR+AS) was performed by applying active stretching of the trapezius muscle concurrently with TPR, using the same protocol as the standalone TPR intervention.

OTHER

The triple combination therapy of EMS+AS+TPR

Electrical Muscle Stimulation combined with Active Stretching during Trigger point Pressure Release (EMS+AS+TPR): This triple combination therapy utilized the EMS+AS component protocol concurrently with the TPR intervention, applying the identical protocols established for the standalone EMS+AS and TPR procedures.

OTHER

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) was applied using the conventional protocol (60 Hz,100 µs,5 mA) with two electrodes placed directly over the MTP region, without stretching.

OTHER

Sham stimulation combined with active stretching (SS+AS)

Sham stimulation combined with active stretching (SS+AS): Participants performed AS using the same EMS device and electrode placement as in the EMS+AS protocol. However, no electrical current was applied. The procedure began with a conversation about the treatment from the researcher while the current amplitude was reduced from 1 mA to 0 mA during the trapezius muscle stretching, accompanied by a beeping sound to simulate stimulation. Participants were subsequently informed that this was the intended treatment.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Suranaree University of Technology

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Bath

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • SEEKAOW CHURPROONG, MD. · University of Bath, United Kingdom.

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-11-25
Primary Completion
2024-03-28
Completion
2025-09-20

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07315776 on ClinicalTrials.gov