Comparison Between Lip Repositioning and Muscle Traction Technique in Treatment of Gummy Smile

NCT07285343 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2025-12-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of conventional and modified lip repositioning for the treatment of gummy smile.

The main question it aims to answer:

Which of these treatment modalities (conventional lip repositioning and containment of the elevator muscle of the upper lip and wing of nose (EMULWN)) has the most durable and least relapse in the treatment of gummy smile?"

Researchers will compare:

1. The primary outcome was the decrease in excessive gingival display by measuring smile line (gingival display) and smile index before and after treatment modalities.
2. The The secondary outcome was to measure the durability and possibility of relapse over 6 months after treatment with high patient satisfaction.

Conditions

  • Gummy Smile Due to Hypermobile Upper Lip
  • Excessive Gingival Display

Interventions

PROCEDURE

lip repositioning

Local anesthesia was administered in the vestibular mucosa. A partial-thickness incision was made at the mucogingival junction from the mesial line angle of the right first molar to the mesial line angle of the left first molar. A second partial- thickness incision, parallel to the first, was made in the labial mucosa, 10 to 12 mm apical to the mucogingival junction. The incisions were connected at each first molar, creating an elliptical outline. The epithelium was removed within the outline of the incisions, leaving the underlying connective tissue exposed. Care was taken to avoid damage to any minor salivary glands in the submucosa. The parallel incision lines were approximated with interrupted stabilization sutures at the midline and other locations along the borders of the incision to ensure proper alignment of the lip midline with the midline of the teeth. Then, a continuous interlocking suture was used to approximate both flap ends.

PROCEDURE

Containment of the elevator muscle of the upper lip and wing of nose (EMULWN) technique

Local anesthesia was administered in the vestibular mucosa and lip then a vertical incision was made on the labial frenum, and two more horizontal incisions were made on the mucogingival line, starting from the frenum incision up to the height of the canines. The flap was carefully divulsed with Goldman Fox scissors and also a curved hemostat, separating the external epithelium from the muscle bundle mucosa on both sides at the height of the lateral incisors and canines. With an absorbable suture thread, the elevator muscle of the upper lip and wing of the nose was pulled downwards, repositioning its bundle nearer the highest portion of the keratinized gingiva. Simple sutures were made, as many as necessary, in order to contain the pulled muscle in this position. The procedure ended up with a continuous suture in the labial frenum and in the horizontal incisions with the use of a 4-0 silk suture thread. The external stitches should be removed in 10-15 days" time.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Suez Canal University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hany Kamel Shalaby, professor · Suez Canal University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
38 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-03-01
Primary Completion
2025-01-01
Completion
2025-03-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07285343 on ClinicalTrials.gov