Pulpotomy With CEM vs Pulpectomy With Ca(OH)2/Iodoform in Primary Molars

NCT07265063 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2025-12-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Will Calcium-Enriched Mixture (CEM) cement pulpotomy have less postoperative pain and more clinical and radiographic success compared to Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform (Metapex) pulpectomy when managing second primary molars with irreversible pulpitis?

Conditions

  • Carious Primary Molars

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Pulpotomy using Calcium-Enriched Mixture (CEM) Cement

pulpotomy procedure using (CEM) Cement as pulp dressing material

PROCEDURE

Pulpectomy using Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste (Metapex)

pulpectomy procdure performed using Metapex paste as root canal filling material

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
6 Years
Max Age
8 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-12-01
Primary Completion
2026-10-01
Completion
2026-12-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07265063 on ClinicalTrials.gov