MedTrace Logo

The Difference in Carbon Footprint Between Diagnostic Upper GI Endoscopy in Dyspeptic Patients Versus Therapeutic Upper GI Bleeding

NCT07261228 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 75

Last updated 2025-12-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the carbon footprint produced from diagnostic upper GI endoscopy in patients with dyspepsia and therapeutic upper GI endoscopy in patients with non-variceal upper GI bleeding. The main question it aims to answer is:

• How much carbon footprint is generated from upper GI endoscopy Participants are already receiving diagnostic and therapeutic upper GI endoscopy as part of their regular medical care for dyspepsia and non-variceal upper GI bleeding, respectively. The carbon footprint generated from this treatment process is examined.

Conditions

  • Carbon Footprint in Upper GI Endoscopy
  • Dyspepsia
  • Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-06-01
Primary Completion
2025-08-31
Completion
2025-12-31

Countries

  • Thailand

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07261228 on ClinicalTrials.gov