Comparative Study of Ziplyft Treatment vs. Traditional Blepharoplasty for Upper Eyelid Rejuvenation

NCT07250139 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2025-11-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study will compare two surgery techniques used for upper eyelid (eyelift) surgery: traditional surgery and a newer method called Ziplyft (a non-powered, hand-held clamp). This study will use a "split-face" design, meaning one eyelid will be treated with the traditional surgery method and the other with Ziplyft, allowing a direct side-by-side comparison.

The objectives of the study are to compare Ziplyft treatment vs. traditional surgery by evaluating bruising, wound closure and incision, surgery case time, and subject/surgeon surveys.

Conditions

  • Dermatochalasis of Upper Eyelid
  • Ptosis, Eyelid
  • Blepharoplasty

Interventions

DEVICE

Ziplyft Device

Ziplyft will be used on one side of the participant's face to compress the excess skin prior to excess eyelid skin removal. Ziplyft compresses the excess skin and seals it together, no suturing is required, and the surgery incision will be closed with tissue adhesive.

OTHER

Comparator Arm: Standard Blepharoplasty

Standard blepharoplasty will be used on the fellow side of the participant's face. Standard blepharoplasty uses a blade, cautery to seal blood vessels, and sutures to close the incision.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Osheru Inc.

    lead INDUSTRY

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
35 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-12-08
Primary Completion
2026-05-31
Completion
2026-09-30
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07250139 on ClinicalTrials.gov