Drain Removal on Postoperative Safety and Patient Satisfaction in R-E-NSM With Prepectoral DIBR

NCT07237828 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 379

Last updated 2025-11-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Breast cancer is a malignant tumor that seriously threatens the health of women, with an increasing incidence rate. The current main treatment methods include multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy, among which surgery is the key. Postoperative care is also very important. Traditional breast surgery requires long-term placement of drainage tubes after the operation. However, long-term placement of drainage tubes increases the incidence of postoperative complications such as infection and delayed wound healing, prolongs hospital stays, increases economic burden, and also affects the aesthetic outcome. Our team has innovatively adopted the "reverse-sequence" endoscopic nipple-sparing-mastectomy with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. This method is highly efficient and safe, with no incisions on the surface of the breast, reducing the risk of incision dehiscence and the probability of flap ischemia and necrosis. Based on this, our team proposes to appropriately relax the drainage criteria and remove the drainage tube earlier under the premise of ensuring the sterility of the effusion, and preliminary findings show that patients have better postoperative aesthetic outcomes, with a lower incidence of flap infection, ischemia, and necrosis than expected, and the degree of breast deformation caused by radiotherapy is also reduced. However, there is still controversy over the pros and cons of drainage criteria. Some scholars believe that strict drainage criteria can reduce the risk of infection and implant displacement, and plastic surgeons are more concerned about the impact of long-term tube placement on aesthetic outcomes and quality of life. Currently there is a lack of large sample, multicenter, randomized controlled studies to provide high - level evidence. Therefore, our team plans to conduct a national multicenter, open, randomized controlled study to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the two drainage methods under the premise of not reducing postoperative surgical and oncological safety, in order to explore the optimal timing for drain removal and improve patients' satisfaction with the reconstructed breast.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Drain Removal Timing After Endoscopic Breast Reconstruction Surgery

The optimal timing for earlier or later removal of drainage tubes after endoscopic breast reconstruction surgery.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University

    collaborator OTHER
  • West China Fourth Hospital of Sichuan University

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Bethune Hospital of Shanxi Medical University

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • The First Hospital of Jilin University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Suining Central Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Zhengzhou Central Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Deyang People's Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Suzhou Municipal Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

    collaborator OTHER
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

    collaborator OTHER
  • The Fourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Guangzhou First People's Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Central Hospital of Taiyuan

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • West China Tianfu Hospital of Sichuan University

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Du Zhenggui

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-12-01
Primary Completion
2032-06-30
Completion
2032-06-30

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07237828 on ClinicalTrials.gov