Unilateral Versus Bilateral Vertebroplasty in Local Anaesthesia

NCT07198776 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 196

Last updated 2025-09-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are a common cause of severe back pain and disability in elderly patients. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement is widely used to relieve pain and stabilize the fractured vertebra. However, there is ongoing debate whether unilateral or bilateral vertebroplasty provides better clinical and radiological outcomes. This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at the University Medical Center Maribor to compare unilateral versus bilateral PVP performed under local anaesthesia. A total of 196 patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the two groups. The primary outcome measure was pain reduction assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included functional improvement measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, injected cement volume, radiological changes (vertebral height, kyphotic angle), and perioperative complications. The results are expected to provide evidence to guide optimal surgical management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Conditions

  • Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty

Injection of PMMA cement into fractured vertebra under fluoroscopic guidance.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Igor Movrin

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-01-01
Primary Completion
2025-06-30
Completion
2025-06-30

Countries

  • Slovenia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07198776 on ClinicalTrials.gov