Effect of Sedation After Ultrasound-Guided Spinal Anesthesia on Back Pain
NCT07198412 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 180
Last updated 2025-11-17
Summary
This study will evaluate whether giving sedation before spinal anesthesia, when performed with ultrasound guidance, reduces the risk of developing back pain after surgery. Spinal anesthesia is commonly used but may cause discomfort or persistent back pain in some patients. By comparing standard techniques, ultrasound guidance, and sedation, we aim to find safer and more comfortable approaches for patients undergoing non-obstetric surgery.
Conditions
- Pain Management
- Postoperative Acute Pain
- Chronic Back Pain
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia
Spinal anesthesia performed under real-time ultrasound guidance using a curvilinear ultrasound probe and 25-27G pencil-point spinal needle. Intrathecal injection of bupivacaine 0.5% hyperbaric (12-15 mg) following local infiltration with lidocaine 1% (2-3 mL).
- DRUG
-
Midazolam plus ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia
Patients will receive midazolam (0.02-0.05 mg/kg IV; max 5 mg) 5-10 minutes prior to spinal anesthesia. Ultrasound guidance used for spinal needle placement. Intrathecal bupivacaine 0.5% hyperbaric (12-15 mg) after lidocaine 1% (2-3 mL) infiltration. Oxygen supplementation at 2 L/min and standard monitoring.
- PROCEDURE
-
Landmark-guided spinal anesthesia
Spinal anesthesia performed using the traditional landmark palpation technique without ultrasound guidance or sedation. Intrathecal bupivacaine 0.5% hyperbaric (12-15 mg) after lidocaine 1% (2-3 mL) infiltration, using a 25-27G pencil-point spinal needle.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Benha University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-04-10
- Completion
- 2026-05-10
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy
NCT04486014 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided PIFB Versus Lidocaine Infusion on Postoperative Pain After Thoracotomy
NCT05885230 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Injection
NCT06336161 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between U\S Guided Erector Spinaeblock and Paravertebral Block on Acute and Chronic Post Mastectomy Pain
NCT04498234 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Erectae Spinae Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesis in Lumbar Surgeries
NCT05123092 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Block Versus Caudal in Lumbar Spine Surgeries
NCT05351203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Perioperative Analgesia Using Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block for Pain Control in Children Aged 2-7 Years Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery
NCT07281235 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Goal of This Study is to Evaluate the Effect of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain After Major Abdominal Surgeries
NCT04382209 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Erector Spinae Plane Block And Retrolaminar Block In Patients Undergoing VATS.
NCT06021327 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Combined With General Anaesthesia Versus Conventional General Anaesthesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT04302129 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Versus Conventional Serratus Anterior Plane Block
NCT05661253 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Anelgesic Effect of Rhomboid Intercostal Nerve Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT05452369 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Versus Lumbar Epidural Block on Postoperative Analgesia, and Inflammatory Response in Abdominal Surgery
NCT03958942 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Thoracotomy
NCT05507281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3 Ultrasound Guided Plane Blocks for Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy
NCT05278598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Preoperative Ultrasound Guided Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Costoclavicular Block for Shoulder Arthroscopy
NCT06913140 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Thoracic Epidural Analgesia With Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Radical Cystectomy Surgery
NCT06324253 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Caudal Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block in Lumbar Surgery
NCT06398600 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block in Post-operative Recovery in Cardiac Surgery With Median Sternotomy.
NCT05356715 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided : Retrolaminar Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04835415 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Ultrasound Guided Superficial, Deep Serratus Plane Blocks and Thoracic Epidural in Thoracotomy
NCT04189120 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
NCT05526469 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block With Dexmedetomidine Added to Bupivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided Pain Management After Mastectomy
NCT06737458 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analgesic Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block Using Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine/Magnesium Sulphate in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT04433624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Caudal Epidural Block and Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Post Operative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Infraumblical Surgeries
NCT05117021 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1