Comparison of Caudal Block and Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block With Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Penile Hypospadias Repair
NCT07197203 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 66
Last updated 2025-09-29
Summary
Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital anomalies in childhood, requiring surgical reconstruction (1). It is a penile malformation with a more proximal or ventral location beyond the usual localization of the urethra. Hypospadias is a common congenital urogenital anomaly in male children, and its incidence is reported to be approximately one in every 300 births. However, it is suggested that hypospadias may increase in developed countries (2, 3). Postoperative pain management followinghypospadias repair is of great importance, as inadequatepain control may lead to adverse endocrine, metabolic, and inflammatory stress responses, resulting in higher morbidity and poor recovery(4).
Regional anesthesia has gained increasing attention in pediatric surgery as a valuable tool for managing perioperative pain and improving surgical outcomes(5). The caudal epidural block has long been considered the gold standard technique fo infraumbilical surgeries, including hypospadias repair, due to its proven efficacy and safety (4). However, its limitations include a relatively short durationof analgesia, the need for larger local anesthetic volumes, and potential adverse effects such as motor block, urinary retention, and inadvertent dural puncture. These drawbacks have led anesthesiologists to explore alternative regional techniques(6-8) Recently, the sacral erector spinae plane (ESPB) block has been introduced as a novel technique for postoperative analgesia in children(9, 10). It is an emerging regional anesthetic technique with significant potential for clinical benefit Nevertheless, its exact mechanism(s) of action have been much debated. These mechanisms include neural blockade and central inhibition from direct spread of local anesthetic to the paravertebral or epidural space, and analgesia mediated by elevated local anesthetic plasma concentrations due to systemic absorption(11).
Evidence suggests sacral ESP block can give excellent analgesia in surgical procedures (12-14). Few studies have examined its use to alleviate acute pain after hypospadias surgery (15, 16). There is a lack of data on the postoperative analgesic efficacy in hypospadias surgery.
The addition of adjuvant agents to local anesthetics has been shown to enhance the quality and duration of regiona anesthesia(17).
Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, has gained significant attention for its sedative, analgesic, and anxiolytic properties in pediatric anesthesia(18).
Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α 2- α 2-adrenergic agonist, has demonstrated sedative and analgesic properties without significant respiratory depression, making it particularly attractive in pediatric anesthesia. When used as an adjuvan to local anesthetics, dexmedetomidine prolongs block duration and reduces rescue analgesic requirements(17).
Despite the established role of caudal block and the emerging potential of sacral ESPB, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials directly comparing their analgesic efficacy in pediatric patients when combined with dexmedetomidine
Conditions
- Hypospadias
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Sacral ESP Block
* Position: Prone with a pillow under the pelvis. * Ultrasound: High-frequency linear probe placed parasagittal, 1-1.5 cm lateral to the midline at S2-S3. Structure identified: skin → subcutaneous tissue → erector spinae muscle → sacral lamina. * Technique: An echogenic 22G needle will be advanced in-plane until contact with the sacral lamina under the erector spinae muscle. After hydro dissection with saline, the study drug will be injected with visible spread along the fascial plane. The same procedure will be repeated contralaterally. * Dose: Bupivacaine 0.25% total 1 mL/kg divided equally on both sides, dexmedetomidine 1 μ g/kg divided equally.
- PROCEDURE
-
Caudal epidural block
* Position: Prone with a pillow under the pelvis. * Ultrasound: High-frequency linear probe placed parasagittal, 1-1.5 cm lateral to the midline at S2-S3. Structure identified: skin → subcutaneous tissue → erector spinae muscle → sacral lamina. * Technique: An echogenic 22G needle will be advanced in-plane until contact with the sacral lamina under the erector spinae muscle. After hydro dissection with saline, the study drug will be injected with visible spread along the fascial plane. The same procedure will be repeated contralaterally. * Dose: Bupivacaine 0.25% total 1 mL/kg divided equally on both sides, dexmedetomidine 1 μ g/kg divided equally.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assiut University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 1 Year
- Max Age
- 6 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-10-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-01
- FDA Drug
- Yes
More Related Trials
-
Caudal Epidural Block and DPNB in Hypospadias
NCT04215874 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pearls and Pitfalls in Usage of Plasma-Rich Platelet Graft Versus Dartos Flap in Distal Penile Hypospadias Repair
NCT06808139 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dexamethasone Added to Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Alone in Caudal Analgesia in Children Undergoing Orchiopexy
NCT01604915 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Caudal Epidural Block on Intraoperative Blood Loss During Hypospadias Repair
NCT02752308 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
The Role of "Hypospadias Objective Scoring Evaluation" (HOSE) and Uroflowmetry in Evaluation of Successful Hypospadias Repair
NCT05032222 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Fibrin-Enhanced TIP Versus Grafted TIP Urethroplasty in Distal Hypospadias
NCT07319780 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Does Low Dose of Dexamethasone Enhance Analgesic Quality of Caudal Analgesia in Children Undergoing Orchiopexy?
NCT04841018 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Caudal Block on the Postoperative Complications in Pediatric Patients After Hypospadias Repair
NCT02164682 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Does Graft Improves the Outcome TIP Repair for Primary Distal Hypospadias?
NCT05528276 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Caudal vs Local Anesthesia in Hypospadias
NCT02512887 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Does Caudal Block Increase the Incidence of Urethrocutaneous Fistula Formation Following Hypospadias Repair in Infants?
NCT02861950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Pudendal vs Caudal Block for Pediatric Penile Surgery
NCT04840654 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Caudal Anesthesia Versus Local Anesthesia in Hypospadias
NCT06417060 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Local Oestrogen Versus Placebo as Preoperative Treatment in Patients With Severe Hypospadias: Effects on Post-operative Complications
NCT01370798 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Long Term Outcome of Hypospadias Repair
NCT02103712 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Engaging Families to Improve the Care of Patients With Hypospadias
NCT05056311 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmotic Outcome of Distal Penile Hypospidias Repair Using Stitch by Stitch Glanuloplasty Versus TIP
NCT05742529 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Trial Of Urethroplasty With Stent Versus Without Stent For Hypospadias
NCT07243457 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Preputial Graft Versus Preputial Flap in Treatment of Proximal Hypospadias With Marked Ventral Curvature (a Comparative Study)
NCT06165120 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Reconstructing Forked Corpus Spongiosum in Hypospadias Repair
NCT04533477 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hemostasis During Hypospadias Surgery
NCT02268019 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Selective Criteria and a Modified Technique of Applying "URAGPI" Technique for More Proximal Degree of Hypospadias
NCT03911635 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Antibiotic Use in Distal Hypospadias Repair
NCT03275519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Pudendal Nerve Block and Caudal Block for Hypospadias in Young Children
NCT03145415 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Is Dorsal Inlay Graft (DIG) With TIP Repair Superior to TIP Alone for Primary Hypospadias?
NCT07086963 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA