EXORA vs ESP Blocks in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07187310 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 114
Last updated 2026-04-15
Summary
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still considered the gold standard for the surgical management of gallbladder disease due to its minimally invasive nature, shorter recovery time, and reduced postoperative complications. Despite these advantages, patients frequently experience moderate to severe postoperative pain, particularly in the early postoperative period, which can impede recovery, delay mobilization, and increase opioid consumption. Excessive opioid use after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with several drawbacks, including nausea, vomiting, sedation, and delayed recovery. It also increases the risk of respiratory depression, especially in vulnerable patients, and may contribute to long-term opioid dependence. These risks highlight the importance of opioid-sparing strategies such as regional anesthesia techniques to improve patient outcomes and enhance recovery. Regional anesthesia techniques have emerged as essential components of multimodal analgesia strategies in abdominal surgeries. Among them, the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block has gained popularity due to its relative ease of administration and favorable safety profile.
Recently, a novel fascial plane block known as the EXORA block has been introduced as a promising alternative for abdominal wall analgesia. This block, which targets a different anatomical plane, is postulated to provide comparable or superior analgesic efficacy to traditional methods while maintaining safety and simplicity in execution. Given the ongoing pursuit of optimal analgesia with minimal side effects, it is essential to compare emerging techniques, such as the EXORA block, with established methods like the ESP block.
The authors hypothesize that the EXORA and the ESP blocks provide superior postoperative analgesia compared to controls in the anterolateral abdomen in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and that the EXORA block analgesic profile is comparable to that of the ESP block.
Conditions
- Postoperative Pain
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
EXORA block
in a supine position, a linear Ultrasound probe (L6-12 RS linear array transducer (6-12 MHz) on GE Healthcare Logiq P7, made in Korea) will be sagittally applied at the parasternal line, lateral to the sternum and xiphoid process. The probe will be manipulated craniocaudally to identify the 6th, 7th, and 8th costal cartilages. At the level of the 8th costal cartilage, a transverse orientation will be used to visualize the rectus abdominis muscle and the costal cartilage beneath. An 88-mm, 22-gauge needle will be directed in-plane from medial to lateral. After confirming the needle position below the rectus abdominis muscle using 4 ml isotonic saline as a hydro-dissection, 25 ml of plain bupivacaine 0.25% concentration will be injected. the spread of the local anesthetic is to be observed to advance laterally under the external oblique muscle and medially under the rectus muscle. The same procedure will be repeated on the other side.
- PROCEDURE
-
Erector Spinae Plane block
in a right lateral position, the linear Ultrasound probe will be placed vertically 3 cm lateral to the midline at the level of the 7th thoracic spinal process, identifying the T7 transverse process, and the overlying erector spinae (ES) muscle. An 88-mm, 22-gauge needle will be advanced craniocaudally in-plane until hitting the T7 transverse process. After using hydro-dissection with 4 ml of isotonic saline to confirm the correct needle position, 25 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered below the erector spinae muscle. The same procedure will be repeated on the other side.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Fayoum University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mohamed A Hamed, MD · Faculty of medicine, Fayoum university
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-12-30
- Primary Completion
- 2026-07-01
- Completion
- 2026-07-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Pain Management in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies
NCT05837702 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries
NCT07272577 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of ESP Block and STAP Plane Block
NCT06663449 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Subcostal Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT05158270 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Effectivity of Erector Spina Plane Block With Different Levels
NCT04316416 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does Erector Spinal Block Improve Quality of Recovery After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04112394 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03420703 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07149584 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies
NCT04587973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Efficacy of ESPB and EOPB for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial (External Oblique Intercostal Plan Block (EOPB) and Erector Spina Plan Block (ESPB) )
NCT07057934 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparation of Bilateral and Unilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT05152602 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of US Guided ESP Block With Port Site Infiltration Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04167176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effects of External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block, Subcostal Transverse Abdominis Plane Block, and Their Combination in the Management of Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery
NCT07179731 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Surgeries
NCT05297981 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block as a Rescue Pain Therapy in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT05706233 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Optimal Patient Positioning for Erector Spinae Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:
NCT07018258 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04845711 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral vs. Unilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT03781687 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Visceral Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03767816 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analgesic Efficacy of Bupivacaine Infiltration, Erector Spinae Plane Block, and Intrathecal Morphine in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07203794 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Preop and Postop ESP Block on Analgesia, Hemodynamics and Patient Satisfaction in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06670313 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Block for Post Hepatectomy Pain
NCT07337330 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06640062 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block and Oblique Subcostal Transverse Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03508531 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided ESP Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia in Major HPB Surgery.
NCT04635644 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA