Hysteroscopy Anesthesia for Relief of Pain
NCT07178379 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70
Last updated 2025-09-17
Summary
This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of local anesthesia on pain perception in patients undergoing outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy. Although generally well tolerated, pain during hysteroscopy remains a leading cause of procedural failure and patient discomfort. Current evidence on the effectiveness of local anesthetic techniques is limited, with considerable variability in study designs, patient populations, and outcomes measured.
This study will compare pain levels between two groups: one receiving local anesthetic infiltration (3% mepivacaine into the uterosacral ligaments), and the other undergoing a placebo-like intervention (saline irrigation without injection). Pain will be assessed using a standardized Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The primary objective is to determine whether local anesthesia significantly reduces pain perception during the procedure. Secondary objectives include evaluating which patient or procedural variables may influence pain (e.g., parity, uterine position, BMI, operator experience) and whether local anesthesia impacts the need for post-procedural analgesia or complication rates.
Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a simple randomization method. Although the study design does not allow for double blinding, efforts will be made to minimize expectation bias-patients will not be explicitly informed whether they are receiving anesthesia or not, and the placebo group will receive simulated intervention. The principal investigator and the statistician will be blinded to the treatment allocation during data analysis.
Inclusion criteria are: age ≥ 18 years, indication for office-based diagnostic hysteroscopy or minor operative procedures (e.g., polypectomy or biopsy), and no previous hysteroscopy experience. Exclusion criteria include known anesthetic allergy, complex procedures (e.g., myomectomy), anatomic uterine malformations, severe complications, or lack of consent.
A total sample size of 58 patients (29 per group) has been calculated based on an expected clinically relevant VAS difference of 1.5 points and a standard deviation of 2.0. To account for possible dropouts, up to 70 patients may be enrolled.
The results of this trial will provide higher quality evidence on whether local anesthesia should be routinely recommended in outpatient hysteroscopy and may support cost-effectiveness studies in the future.
Conditions
- Pain Management
- Outpatient Hysteroscopy
- Local Anesthesia
- Procedural Pain Relief
- Gynecologic Procedure
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Local paracervical Anesthesia
1\. Intervention Group (Local Anesthesia) Name: Mepivacaine 3% uterosacral ligament block Type: Pharmacological (local anesthetic). Dose/Administration: Drug: Mepivacaine hydrochloride 3% (4 vials of 1.7 mL each, total 6.8 mL). Route: Bilateral injection into uterosacral ligaments (2 injections per ligament, 3.4 mL per side). Technique: Patient in lithotomy position. Uterosacral ligaments identified posteriorly to the cervix. Injection with a 27G Carpule needle (25 mm length) at 2-3 mm depth. Slow infusion (to minimize dispersion). Timing: Administered ≥1 minute before hysteroscopy.
- OTHER
-
Placebo
Procedure: Vaginal and cervical irrigation with 0.9% saline solution (4 irrigations, mimicking anesthesia administration). Mimicry: Same equipment (syringe, speculum) as intervention group. Identical patient positioning and timing
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jorge Garcia Fernandez, MD, Principal Investigator · MD Obstetrics and Gynecology Reina Sofia Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-09-06
- Primary Completion
- 2025-10-31
- Completion
- 2025-12-31
More Related Trials
-
Multimodal Pain Management After Robotic-Assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT04429022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
GnRH Agonist Pretreatment in Hysteroscopic Myomectomy
NCT01873378 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESP vs TAP in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT04839445 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Music During Diagnostic Hysteroscopy
NCT01703871 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Resectoscopic Treatment of Atypical Endometrial Polyps in Fertile Women
NCT00490087 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Hysteroscopic Monopolar and Bipolar Resection
NCT00323999 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Lidocaine and Outpatient Gynecologic Laparoscopy
NCT01250002 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain Characteristics After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT01838382 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Truclear on Patient Quality of Life
NCT02934789 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain and Hysteroscopy
NCT05316506 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Endometrial Polypectomy Performed With Bipolar Electrode Versapoint and Laser Diode. A Randomised Controlled Trial.
NCT02126397 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
TAP vs Surgical Infiltration of Local Anesthetic in Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy
NCT02519023 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laparascopic TAP and Hysterectomy Trial #2
NCT03711981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
NCT03650998 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Hysteroscopic Morcellator (HM).
NCT01537822 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial Comparing Morcellation With Electrical Resection for Removal of Uterine Polyps
NCT01509313 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Combined Anesthesia for Laparoscopy Surgery in Gynecology
NCT01246323 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Improved Recovery Using Multimodal Peri-operative Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Myomectomy
NCT00978601 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginoscopy Compared to Traditional Hysteroscopy for Hysteroscopy Morcellation in Outpatient Clinic. A Randomized Trial
NCT04373694 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Analgesic Effect of Trigger Point Injection and EMLA for Shoulder Pain in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT01845532 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predictive Factors for Successful Operative Hysteroscopy Using Tissue Removal Device (TruClear System) Without Anesthesia
NCT05722028 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Vaginal or Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, Persistent Postsurgical Pain
NCT01537731 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Management of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids in Pregnancy by Laparotomic Myomectomy: a Prospective Cohort Study
NCT06009562 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Ulipristal vs. GnRHa Prior to Laparoscopic Myomectomy
NCT02288130 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Transumbilical Versus Transvaginal Specimen Retrieval at Minilaparoscopy
NCT01418807 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3