Trial Outcomes & Findings for Advanced Dressings for CVC Infection Prevention in PICU (NCT NCT07175116)

NCT ID: NCT07175116

Last Updated: 2026-07-13

Results Overview

Participants who developed central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection (CVC-BSI), confirmed according to the Bacteriemia Zero protocol based on clinical signs and positive blood culture findings during follow-up.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

250 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From catheter insertion to 4 weeks or until catheter removal

Results posted on

2026-07-13

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Experimental - Chlorhexidine Gluconate-impregnated Dressing
Participants receive advanced transparent dressings impregnated with chlorhexidine gluconate at the CVC insertion site. 3M™ Tegaderm™ Antimicrobial Transparent Dressing (chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated): Individually applied transparent dressing containing chlorhexidine gluconate (0.5-1 mg/cm²) for antimicrobial protection at the central venous catheter insertion site. The dressing maintains site visibility, reduces catheter manipulation frequency, and provides sustained release of chlorhexidine to lower colonisation and bloodstream infection risk.
Control - Conventional Transparent Dressing
Participants receive standard transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial activity at the CVC insertion site. Conventional transparent polyurethane dressing: Transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial impregnation, applied at the central venous catheter insertion site. This dressing allows site inspection and is widely used in standard paediatric intensive care protocols but provides no antimicrobial activity.
Overall Study
STARTED
125
125
Overall Study
COMPLETED
125
125
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Experimental - Chlorhexidine Gluconate-impregnated Dressing
n=125 Participants
Participants receive advanced transparent dressings impregnated with chlorhexidine gluconate at the CVC insertion site. 3M™ Tegaderm™ Antimicrobial Transparent Dressing (chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated): Individually applied transparent dressing containing chlorhexidine gluconate (0.5-1 mg/cm²) for antimicrobial protection at the central venous catheter insertion site. The dressing maintains site visibility, reduces catheter manipulation frequency, and provides sustained release of chlorhexidine to lower colonisation and bloodstream infection risk.
Control - Conventional Transparent Dressing
n=125 Participants
Participants receive standard transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial activity at the CVC insertion site. Conventional transparent polyurethane dressing: Transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial impregnation, applied at the central venous catheter insertion site. This dressing allows site inspection and is widely used in standard paediatric intensive care protocols but provides no antimicrobial activity.
Total
n=250 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
56.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60.7 • n=125 Participants
56.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 71.9 • n=125 Participants
56.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 55.1 • n=250 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
57 Participants
n=125 Participants
54 Participants
n=125 Participants
111 Participants
n=250 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
68 Participants
n=125 Participants
71 Participants
n=125 Participants
139 Participants
n=250 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment
Spain
125 participants
n=125 Participants
125 participants
n=125 Participants
250 participants
n=250 Participants
Catheter type (PICC / CICC)
PICC
97 participants
n=125 Participants
40 participants
n=125 Participants
137 participants
n=250 Participants
Catheter type (PICC / CICC)
CICC
28 participants
n=125 Participants
85 participants
n=125 Participants
113 participants
n=250 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From catheter insertion to 4 weeks or until catheter removal

Participants who developed central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection (CVC-BSI), confirmed according to the Bacteriemia Zero protocol based on clinical signs and positive blood culture findings during follow-up.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental - Chlorhexidine Gluconate-impregnated Dressing
n=125 Participants
Participants receive advanced transparent dressings impregnated with chlorhexidine gluconate at the CVC insertion site. 3M™ Tegaderm™ Antimicrobial Transparent Dressing (chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated): Individually applied transparent dressing containing chlorhexidine gluconate (0.5-1 mg/cm²) for antimicrobial protection at the central venous catheter insertion site. The dressing maintains site visibility, reduces catheter manipulation frequency, and provides sustained release of chlorhexidine to lower colonisation and bloodstream infection risk.
Control - Conventional Transparent Dressing
n=125 Participants
Participants receive standard transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial activity at the CVC insertion site. Conventional transparent polyurethane dressing: Transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial impregnation, applied at the central venous catheter insertion site. This dressing allows site inspection and is widely used in standard paediatric intensive care protocols but provides no antimicrobial activity.
Number of Participants With Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection (CVC-BSI)
3 Participants
23 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At catheter removal (up to 14 days after insertion)

Population: All randomised participants were included in the outcome analysis (intention-to-treat population).

Positive culture of catheter tip (\>15 CFU/mL) according to standard microbiological protocol.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental - Chlorhexidine Gluconate-impregnated Dressing
n=125 Participants
Participants receive advanced transparent dressings impregnated with chlorhexidine gluconate at the CVC insertion site. 3M™ Tegaderm™ Antimicrobial Transparent Dressing (chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated): Individually applied transparent dressing containing chlorhexidine gluconate (0.5-1 mg/cm²) for antimicrobial protection at the central venous catheter insertion site. The dressing maintains site visibility, reduces catheter manipulation frequency, and provides sustained release of chlorhexidine to lower colonisation and bloodstream infection risk.
Control - Conventional Transparent Dressing
n=125 Participants
Participants receive standard transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial activity at the CVC insertion site. Conventional transparent polyurethane dressing: Transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial impregnation, applied at the central venous catheter insertion site. This dressing allows site inspection and is widely used in standard paediatric intensive care protocols but provides no antimicrobial activity.
Catheter Colonisation Rate
3 Participants
23 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks

Erythema, pruritus or dermatitis at the catheter insertion site documented by clinical observation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental - Chlorhexidine Gluconate-impregnated Dressing
n=125 Participants
Participants receive advanced transparent dressings impregnated with chlorhexidine gluconate at the CVC insertion site. 3M™ Tegaderm™ Antimicrobial Transparent Dressing (chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated): Individually applied transparent dressing containing chlorhexidine gluconate (0.5-1 mg/cm²) for antimicrobial protection at the central venous catheter insertion site. The dressing maintains site visibility, reduces catheter manipulation frequency, and provides sustained release of chlorhexidine to lower colonisation and bloodstream infection risk.
Control - Conventional Transparent Dressing
n=125 Participants
Participants receive standard transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial activity at the CVC insertion site. Conventional transparent polyurethane dressing: Transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial impregnation, applied at the central venous catheter insertion site. This dressing allows site inspection and is widely used in standard paediatric intensive care protocols but provides no antimicrobial activity.
Skin Complications at Insertion Site
21 Participants
14 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks

Total number of dressing replacements per patient recorded during catheterisation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental - Chlorhexidine Gluconate-impregnated Dressing
n=125 Participants
Participants receive advanced transparent dressings impregnated with chlorhexidine gluconate at the CVC insertion site. 3M™ Tegaderm™ Antimicrobial Transparent Dressing (chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated): Individually applied transparent dressing containing chlorhexidine gluconate (0.5-1 mg/cm²) for antimicrobial protection at the central venous catheter insertion site. The dressing maintains site visibility, reduces catheter manipulation frequency, and provides sustained release of chlorhexidine to lower colonisation and bloodstream infection risk.
Control - Conventional Transparent Dressing
n=125 Participants
Participants receive standard transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial activity at the CVC insertion site. Conventional transparent polyurethane dressing: Transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial impregnation, applied at the central venous catheter insertion site. This dressing allows site inspection and is widely used in standard paediatric intensive care protocols but provides no antimicrobial activity.
Number of Dressing Changes Per Patient
1.8 changes per patient
Standard Deviation 0.8
2.1 changes per patient
Standard Deviation 1.4

Adverse Events

Experimental - Chlorhexidine Gluconate-impregnated Dressing

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 21 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control - Conventional Transparent Dressing

Serious events: 23 serious events
Other events: 14 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Experimental - Chlorhexidine Gluconate-impregnated Dressing
n=125 participants at risk
Participants receive advanced transparent dressings impregnated with chlorhexidine gluconate at the CVC insertion site. 3M™ Tegaderm™ Antimicrobial Transparent Dressing (chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated): Individually applied transparent dressing containing chlorhexidine gluconate (0.5-1 mg/cm²) for antimicrobial protection at the central venous catheter insertion site. The dressing maintains site visibility, reduces catheter manipulation frequency, and provides sustained release of chlorhexidine to lower colonisation and bloodstream infection risk.
Control - Conventional Transparent Dressing
n=125 participants at risk
Participants receive standard transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial activity at the CVC insertion site. Conventional transparent polyurethane dressing: Transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial impregnation, applied at the central venous catheter insertion site. This dressing allows site inspection and is widely used in standard paediatric intensive care protocols but provides no antimicrobial activity.
Infections and infestations
Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CLABSI)
2.4%
3/125 • Number of events 3 • From catheter insertion until catheter removal or up to 4 weeks follow-up.
Adverse events were prospectively collected during the catheterisation period through clinical observation and microbiological assessment. Catheter-related bloodstream infections were defined according to standard diagnostic criteria. Skin complications (e.g., erythema, pruritus, dermatitis) were recorded based on clinical assessment at the insertion site.
18.4%
23/125 • Number of events 23 • From catheter insertion until catheter removal or up to 4 weeks follow-up.
Adverse events were prospectively collected during the catheterisation period through clinical observation and microbiological assessment. Catheter-related bloodstream infections were defined according to standard diagnostic criteria. Skin complications (e.g., erythema, pruritus, dermatitis) were recorded based on clinical assessment at the insertion site.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Experimental - Chlorhexidine Gluconate-impregnated Dressing
n=125 participants at risk
Participants receive advanced transparent dressings impregnated with chlorhexidine gluconate at the CVC insertion site. 3M™ Tegaderm™ Antimicrobial Transparent Dressing (chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated): Individually applied transparent dressing containing chlorhexidine gluconate (0.5-1 mg/cm²) for antimicrobial protection at the central venous catheter insertion site. The dressing maintains site visibility, reduces catheter manipulation frequency, and provides sustained release of chlorhexidine to lower colonisation and bloodstream infection risk.
Control - Conventional Transparent Dressing
n=125 participants at risk
Participants receive standard transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial activity at the CVC insertion site. Conventional transparent polyurethane dressing: Transparent polyurethane dressing without antimicrobial impregnation, applied at the central venous catheter insertion site. This dressing allows site inspection and is widely used in standard paediatric intensive care protocols but provides no antimicrobial activity.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin irritation
16.8%
21/125 • Number of events 21 • From catheter insertion until catheter removal or up to 4 weeks follow-up.
Adverse events were prospectively collected during the catheterisation period through clinical observation and microbiological assessment. Catheter-related bloodstream infections were defined according to standard diagnostic criteria. Skin complications (e.g., erythema, pruritus, dermatitis) were recorded based on clinical assessment at the insertion site.
11.2%
14/125 • Number of events 14 • From catheter insertion until catheter removal or up to 4 weeks follow-up.
Adverse events were prospectively collected during the catheterisation period through clinical observation and microbiological assessment. Catheter-related bloodstream infections were defined according to standard diagnostic criteria. Skin complications (e.g., erythema, pruritus, dermatitis) were recorded based on clinical assessment at the insertion site.

Additional Information

Dr. Manuel Pabón Carrasco

University of Seville

Phone: 954 55 14 75

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place