Evaluation Of Liver Resection Using Harmonic Scalpel Versus Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA).
NCT07142876 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2025-08-27
Summary
Evaluation Of Liver Resection Using Harmonic Scalpel Versus Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA)
Introduction The mode of parenchymal transection in hepatic resection has been a topic of great debate for decades. Many resections have now evolved into laparoscopic , and robotic-assisted procedures to limit morbidity. Morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection has progressively improved over the years due to improved equipment, operative technique \[3\], and anesthetic management. Prior to 1980, mortality rates were reported to be in the 10-20% range with many deaths related to perioperative hemorrhage. Now perioperative mortality has dropped significantly to approximately 5%.
The clamp-crush technique, first reported in 1974, has been used for decades and remains the standard means of parenchymal division for many surgeons. Control of intraoperative hemorrhage has been one of the principle technical problems in advancing liver surgery. Excess blood loss and intraoperative blood transfusions have been shown to be associated with increased perioperative mortality and morbidity including an increased rate of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence . Transfusions are also associated with increased infections and with increased cost. Costs of blood transfusions were recently examined in surgical patients.
Many devices are now available to surgeons for division of the liver parenchyma in both open and minimally invasive surgery including: the CUSA (Tyco Healthcare, Mansfield, MA), Harmonic Scalpel (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA), Ligasure (Valley Lab, Tyco Healthcare, Boulder, CO, USA), Tissue Link (Salient Surgical Technologies, Portsmouth, NH), water-jet dissection, radiofrequency, microwave assisted resection, vascular staplers, and others In this study, we looked at the TissueLink bipolar sealer device that was used in combination with the CUSA in group 1 termed the CUSA/TissueLink group, and the Harmonic Scalpel in the group 2 termed Harmonic Scalpel/TissueLink. The TissueLink uses radiofrequency energy focused near the end of the device for electrocautery and a low volume saline drip that produces ohmic heat causing precoagulation of hepatic parenchyma. The saline keeps the temperature at or below 100 C to avoid eshcar formation ultimately helping prevent delayed biliary leak and hemorrhage. The hemostatic effects of TissueLink are a result of its disruption of the collagen in blood vessels causing closing of the lumen .
The CUSA, a commonly used device in hepatic resection, was used in combination with the TissueLink in this study. We previously described this combination of devices reporting a shorter length of hospital stay, decreased operative time, and decreased intraoperative blood transfusion . CUSA uses ultrasonic energy to fragment and aspirate parenchymal tissue. This exposes biliary as well as vascular structures that may then be closed in a variety of ways at the surgeon's discretion. It allows for a precise transection plane allowing preservation of normal hepatic tissue .
The Harmonic Scalpel, used in this study in combination with the TissueLink, utilizes ultrasonic vibration of two blades causing destruction of hydrogen bonds. This disruption of hydrogen bonds causes protein denaturization coagulating small vessels of 3 mm diameter. The parenchyma is also cut when the blades move in a saw-like fashion In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of two different techniques described above for the division of the hepatic parenchyma in order to improve perioperative outcomes.
Conditions
- Liver Resection
- Liver Tumours
- Liver Transplant Disorder
- Trauma Abdomen
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Liver resection Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA)
In-group A Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Settings Aspirator (CUSA) with standard tip was used for parenchymal transection with the following Settings; 23 kHz, 70 Watt, and continuous irrigation at rate of 4-6 ml/min with normal saline and the vessel coagulation was performed by the bipolar sealer (Valleylab force FX electrosurgical generator, Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA), the power was used at 50 Watt coagulation.
- PROCEDURE
-
Liver resection with the harmonic scalpel
In group B the harmonic scalpel (Ethicon EndoSurgery, Johnson \& Johnson, New Jersey, USA) was set at a high power, and blood vessels or bile ducts up to 3-4 mm in diameter were coagulated for 5-6 seconds.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sohag University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
AbdElaal A Prof. AbdElaal Ali Sleem, professor · AbdElaal Ali Sleem
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- FACTORIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 6 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-08-22
- Primary Completion
- 2026-11-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-30
More Related Trials
-
External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block vs. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT05632991 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Regional Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07321639 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
"The Efficiency of Laparoscopic-assisted Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Post-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pain
NCT04641403 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Versus Paravertebral Block in the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02379780 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparision of M-TAPA Versus TAPB After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT05207306 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Ultrasonic Dissection Assisted Minilaparotomy Cholecystectomy
NCT01723540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clipless Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Harmonic Scalpel in Cirrhotic Patients a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT01009450 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
External Oblique Plane Block and Subcostal Tap Block for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07061262 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Modified TAPA and QL Blocks in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies
NCT06540586 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Subcostal TAP Block and Local Anesthetic Infiltration After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT05769881 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clamp-crush Technique Versus Harmonic Scalpel in Living Donor Hepatectomy
NCT02853981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Modified-thoracoabdominal Nerves Block Through a Perichondrial Approach
NCT05017090 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Recto Intercostal Nerve Block
NCT07003698 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
4-Point TAP Block vs. Combined RSB-OSTAP Block for Recovery After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07264608 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP) for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery
NCT02185716 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01595165 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Block Versus Erector Spinae Block in Open Cholecystectomy
NCT06410911 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Liver Cauterization Increases the Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02852408 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Chronic Abdominal Pain After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT06686875 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Quality of Recovery
NCT06321185 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus US-Guided Subcostal TAP Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04276285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Analgesic Effect of Subcostal TAP Block
NCT02708017 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional SILS vs Harmonic Scalpel SILS
NCT01272505 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Pain Management in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies
NCT06326281 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block With Serratus Intercostal Plane and Rectus Sheath Block in Cholecystectomy
NCT06241794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA