Hybrid Osteoplasty Versus Osteotomy in Rhinoplasty
NCT07142525 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200
Last updated 2025-10-02
Summary
This study is designed to compare two common techniques for reducing the nasal hump during rhinoplasty: the traditional method using osteotomes and rasps, and a newer technique called hybrid osteoplasty that uses a surgical drill. Both approaches aim to improve the appearance and function of the nose. The trial will measure pain, swelling, bruising, and the smoothness of the nasal bridge, as well as patient satisfaction and breathing outcomes. Participants will be followed for one year to assess both early healing and long-term results.
Conditions
- Rhinoplasty Techniques
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Hybrid Osteoplasty
Open rhinoplasty with dorsal hump reduction performed using a powered surgical burr under irrigation and direct visualization. Bone is contoured gradually to achieve a smooth dorsum while preserving the keystone area. No dorsal osteotomy is performed in this arm. Cartilaginous work and adjunctive steps (e.g., septoplasty or tip refinement) are performed as clinically indicated but are not part of the intervention being tested.
- PROCEDURE
-
Traditional Osteotomy and Rasping
Open rhinoplasty using the conventional technique for dorsal hump reduction. The bony hump is resected with a straight osteotome, followed by manual rasping to refine the nasal dorsum, with preservation of the keystone area. Powered burrs are not used for primary dorsal contouring in this arm. Cartilaginous work and adjunctive procedures may be performed as clinically indicated but are not part of the tested intervention.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Sulaimani
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Goran L Omer, PhD · University of Sulaimani
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-01
Countries
- Iraq
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Sinus Augmentation Bone Healing Using Autograft and Xenograft Compared to Xenograft Alone
NCT06247098 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Two Different Techniques for Sinus Elevation, Open Versus Closed .
NCT06265467 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Osteogenic Potential of Cissus Quadrangularis Alveolar Ridge Distraction
NCT04669795 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison Between PEEK With Autogenous Bone Graft and PEEK With Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
NCT06521853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fixation Free Sandwich Osteotomy With an Interpositional Inlay Graft in Compere to Conventional Sandwich Osteotomy
NCT06089928 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bone Volume Using Patient Specific Autogenous Bone Plug Versus Particulate Autogenous Bone for Unilateral Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction
NCT07137975 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cortical Bone Plate Versus Cortico-cancellous Block Graft
NCT04567966 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tenting Screws Versus Autogenous Ring Block Grafts During Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
NCT06845449 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Assessment of Guided Cortical Shell Technique for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
NCT06942013 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation in Posterior Mandible Using Tunneling Technique With Amix of Autogenous Bone and Xenograft With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT03712631 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Computer-guided vs. Conventional Cortical Shell Technique for Horizontal Augmentation
NCT05311332 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vascularized Inter-positional Periosteal Connective-tissue Flap Versus Collagen Membrane in Guided Bone Regeneration
NCT05813340 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Two Surgical Techniques for Building up the Bone Where a Dental Implant is to be Placed
NCT06871657 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Autobone and Bioactive Glass With Ridge Splitting
NCT04814160 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Linear Micro-Perforation Ridge Split Approach
NCT06887595 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Horizontal Anterior Mandibular Augmentation With Split Bone Block Technique From the Chin
NCT06727591 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Modified Piezosurgery Alveolar Bone Cut With Osseodensification Drills in Expanding Narrow Alveolar Bone
NCT06294171 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Osseodensification Versus Osseodensification With Ridge Splitting in Horizontally Deficient Ridge
NCT05569564 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transcrestal Sinus Lift Using Osseodensification Versus Lateral Window Technique
NCT06126536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation Without Primary Closure
NCT01901783 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic and Histological Evaluation of Regenerated Bone After Grafting Using Allograft Shell and Autogenous Chips
NCT04324697 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
One Stage Ridge Splitting Using 2 Different Techniques in Maxilla
NCT06891261 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Expansion by Osseodensification Simultaneously With Implant Placement in Narrow Alveolar Ridges
NCT03592381 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Computer Guided Versus Free Hand Horizontal Ridge Augmentation in Anterior Mandible.
NCT05556330 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Tooth Graft for Ridge Augmentation
NCT06416605 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA