Pericapsular Nerve Group Block vs. Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block vs. Caudal Block for Hip Surgeries

NCT07137962 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2025-08-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study aims to compare the effect of pericapsular nerve group block versus fascia iliaca compartment block versus caudal block regarding Postoperative analgesia in children undergoing hip surgeries.

Conditions

  • Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
  • Hip Surgeries
  • Perioperative Analgesia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

PENG Block

The curvilinear low-frequency (2-5 MHz) ultrasound probe was placed over the line parallel to the inguinal ligament. It was subsequently rotated 45° to identify the anterior inferior iliac spine, the ilio-pubic eminence, and the psoas tendon. A 22-gauge echogenic needle was inserted in plain to place the tip in musculo-fascial plain between pubic ramus posteriorly and psoas tendon anteriorly, using hydro-dissection technique. Following negative aspiration, a total volume of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected.

PROCEDURE

FICB Block

The linear ultrasound probe was placed over the inguinal ligament in the sagittal plane, inferomedial to the anterior superior iliac spine. Upon identifying the "bow-tie sign" formed by the sartorius muscle and the internal oblique muscle by sliding medially and rotating the probe. 22-gauge echogenic needle was introduced 1 cm cephalad to the inguinal ligament to place the needle tip in the space between the internal oblique and iliacus muscles, using the hydro-dissection technique. A total volume of 0.5 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% was injected following negative aspiration.

PROCEDURE

Caudal Block

After induction of general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the left lateral position with the upper hip flexed at 90° and the lower hip flexed at 45°. The region was then swabbed in a craniocaudal direction with a 70% alcohol solution. After palpating the landmarks (the upper posterior iliac spine and sacral hiatus from the edges of an equilateral triangle), an epidural puncture was performed in the most proximal region of the sacral hiatus with the needle inclined 45-60° to the skin. While palpating with the index finger of the left hand, a needle was inserted immediately below the spinous process S4. After perforating the membrane, which occludes the sacral hiatus, the needle was advanced no more than 1-3 mm to avoid a bloody puncture or an intrathecal injection. Bupivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 1 ml/kg was injected.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Year
Max Age
6 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-10-01
Primary Completion
2025-03-01
Completion
2025-03-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07137962 on ClinicalTrials.gov