Comparative Study Between US Guided Erector Spinae and US Guided Cudal Epidural Block

NCT07127601 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2025-08-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Inguinal hernia is a common condition requiring surgical repair in the pediatric age group. The incidence of inguinal hernias is approximately 3% to 5% in term infants and 13% in infants born at less than 33 weeks of gestational age. Inguinal hernias in both term and preterm infants are commonly repaired shortly after diagnosis to avoid incarceration of the hernia. Given the lack of definitive data, optimal timing for repair of inguinal hernias in infants remains debatable\[1\].

: An erector spinae plane block is a relatively new regional anesthetic technique. Apart from case reports and small series, the literature regarding pediatric use is limited.

The first author to describe caudal anaesthesia as applied to children (here in connection with urologic surgical procedures) was Meredith Campbell in 1933.(2) Over time, this idea has developed into a technique of great interest, especially for use in premature infants and in newborns, considering that these paediatric subgroups are, as a result of an immature state of the CNS, at high risk of perioperative respiratory depression.

This study will be conducted to compare caudal versus ESPB as regard intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in unilateral inguinal hernia and the feasibility of ESPB in paediatric patient.

Conditions

  • Anesthesia
  • Hernia, Inguinal

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Ultrasound guided erector spinae plain block (ESPB).

Depending on the size of patient, either a 27 g 3 cm hypodermic needle or a 21 g 5 or 10 cm short bevel needle was used. All blocks were performed with the ultrasound guidance in the parasagittal position and with continuous in-plane needle visualization. The local anesthetic was deposited in the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle superficial to the transverse processes, after confirming the correct tissue plane by hydro-dissection. protocols for choosing 0.25% bupivacaine with a dose of 0.5ml/kg was determined by the age and weight of the patient.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ain Shams University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
3 Months
Max Age
6 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-01-01
Primary Completion
2023-09-01
Completion
2023-12-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07127601 on ClinicalTrials.gov