Shacklock Neural Mobilization vs. McKenzie on Pain and Functional Disability in Lumbar Radiculopathy

Summary

This randomized comparative trial evaluates the efficacy of Shacklock neural mobilization versus the McKenzie extension principle in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. The study aims to compare both interventions in terms of their effectiveness in reducing pain and improving functional disability. Outcomes will be measured using validated tools such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The trial seeks to inform evidence-based physiotherapeutic approaches for managing lumbar radiculopathy.

Conditions

• Lumbar Radiculopathy

Interventions

OTHER

Shacklock Neural Mobilization

In the SNM group, participants lay supine with hips neutral and knees flexed to 45 degrees. Therapists applied the remote slider technique by extending the knee near end-range and dorsiflexing the ankle to 15 degrees, performed in 3 sets of 15 reps with 30-second rests. Each session lasted 20 minutes including setup. Progression was made by increasing hip flexion in 5 degrees increments when a VAS pain reduction of ≥2 cm was observed. This technique, based on neurodynamic principles, was designed to reduce neural mechanosensitivity and improve mobility in patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

OTHER

McKenzie Extension Principle

MEP group was treated with MEP in a prone position, starting with 10 repetitions of active trunk extension, holding end-range for 3 seconds. If no symptom centralization occurred, therapists progressed from patient-applied overpressure (EIL-POP) to clinician-applied grade III mobilizations (3 oscillations/second), following McKenzie's force progression model. Each session included 3 sets of 10 repetitions with 1-minute rest between sets, totaling 15 minutes of active intervention. For unilateral symptoms, the approach advanced to hips-off-center techniques involving a 15 degree lateral shift. This graded sequence aimed to reduce nerve root compression and promote symptom centralization.

OTHER

Hydrocollator hot packs

Both groups received standardized thermotherapy using hydrocollator-heated moist hot packs (40 degrees centigrade, wrapped in 6-8 towel layers) applied to the lumbar region for 15-20 minutes to improve tissue compliance and reduce pain. Participants were positioned prone or side-lying based on comfort and symptom severity; semi-prone positions with pillow support were used for those with heightened sensitivity to maintain spinal neutrality. Thermotherapy was administered five times in week 1 and three times weekly during weeks 2-3. Skin condition and comfort were monitored. This pre-treatment method promoted transient pain relief and muscle relaxation, enhancing tolerance to subsequent therapeutic interventions.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• King Saud University

  lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

• Prof. Ahmad H. Alghadir, PhD · Rehabilitation Reseach Chair; King Saud University

Study Design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

25 Years

Max Age

38 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2021-04-07

Primary Completion

2021-07-19

Completion

2021-11-26

Countries

• Saudi Arabia

Study Locations