AI-Orchestrated Workflow Versus Consultant Ophthalmologist for Refractive Surgery and Keratoconus Diagnosis (AEYE Trial)
NCT07096232 · Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2025-09-15
Summary
Background and Rationale:
Laser vision correction procedures, such as LASIK (Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis), PRK (Photorefractive Keratectomy), and SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction), are highly effective but require careful preoperative screening to ensure safety. One of the most critical aspects of screening is identifying keratoconus and other corneal ectatic disorders-conditions that cause progressive thinning and bulging of the cornea, often contraindicating surgery. Early detection is essential to avoid vision-threatening complications.
Despite advanced corneal imaging tools such as Scheimpflug tomography and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), accurate diagnosis-particularly in borderline or early-stage cases-remains challenging and subject to variability in human interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers the potential to improve diagnostic precision, reduce oversight, and standardize surgical planning.
Purpose of the Study:
This study evaluates the performance of AEYE (Automated Evaluation for Your Eye), a multi-agent AI system designed to support ophthalmologists in diagnosing keratoconus and determining refractive surgery eligibility. AEYE simulates the clinical workflow of an anterior segment specialist by orchestrating three specialized agents:
History \& Risk Agent: Reviews patient history and extracts risk factors.
Imaging Agent: Analyzes corneal tomography, AS-OCT, and epithelial mapping scans.
Surgical Decision Agent: Integrates all findings, assigns a diagnosis, and recommends appropriate treatment options, including surgical eligibility or corneal cross-linking (CXL).
Study Design:
The study includes 50 real-world patient cases, both retrospective (from 2020 onward) and prospective, who were evaluated for refractive surgery or keratoconus. Each case is analyzed independently by AEYE and a consultant ophthalmologist (blinded to AI output), using the same multimodal clinical and imaging data. Diagnostic accuracy, agreement in surgical recommendations, and workflow efficiency are assessed.
Anticipated Impact:
By comparing AI-derived decisions with expert clinical judgment, this study aims to validate whether structured AI workflows like AEYE can serve as reliable, safe, and explainable decision support tools. If successful, AEYE may offer a scalable solution to reduce diagnostic variability and enhance the safety and consistency of refractive surgery screening.
Conditions
- Keratoconus
- Refractive Surgery
- Machine Learning
- Artifical Intelligence
- Diagnostic Accuracy
- Clinical Decision Support
- Ophthalmology
Interventions
- DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
-
Multi-Agent AI Diagnostic Workflow (AEYE)
This intervention consists of an orchestrated diagnostic workflow utilizing multiple specialized artificial intelligence (AI) agents to analyze patient data and ophthalmic imaging for the diagnosis of refractive errors and keratoconus. The workflow, named Automated Evaluation for Your Eye (AEYE), integrates various AI modules designed for data extraction, image interpretation, and decision support. Each patient's clinical information, corneal topography, tomography, and other relevant imaging are processed sequentially through these AI agents, with results synthesized into a diagnostic recommendation. The system operates independently of clinician input, and outputs are blinded prior to comparison with consultant ophthalmologist assessments. The intervention is intended to assess diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and concordance with expert clinical decision-making.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ahmed I ElSayegh
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Hazem Yassin Clinics
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-09-18
- Completion
- 2025-09-30
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of the Impact of Corneal Width on Surgically Induced Astigmatism (SIA) and Functional Results After Bimanual 1.4 mm Microincision Cataract Surgery (B-MICS), Coaxial 1.8 mm MICS (C-MICS) and 2.4 mm Small Incision Cataract Surgery (C-SICS).
NCT05510869 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Demarcation Line Depth in Transepithelial Versus Epithelium-off Accelerated Cross-linking (AXL) in Keratocouns
NCT04045626 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Visual Outcomes of an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens Targeted for Monovision in Highly Myopic Eyes: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07168109 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Wavefront Guided Scleral Lenses for Keratoconus and Irregular Astigmatism
NCT04698590 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RLE Outcomes With Bilateral Implantation of Odyssey IOLs
NCT06979557 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
An Assessment of Residual Spherical Aberration, Postoperative Total High Order Aberrations, and Functional Vision Correlation Following Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation
NCT01190631 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LASIK Surgery With a New Laser for the Treatment of Myopia Without Astigmatism
NCT04794023 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Aspheric Toric & Non-toric Aphakic Intraocular Lenses
NCT01268540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Manually Performed Limbal Relaxing Incisions vs Femtosecond Laser-guided Astigmatic Keratotomy
NCT03264534 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Toric IOL vs Non-toric IOL With LRI for Corneal Astigmatism
NCT03633851 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Epithelium-on Cross-linking Versus Observation of Fellow Eyes of Patients With Unilateral Clinically Evident Keratoconus
NCT06267495 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Acrysof Toric SN60T3corneal Astigmatism Between 0.75 and 1.00 D.
NCT00542581 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Corneal High Order Aberrations After Stream Light and Mechanical Photorefractive Keratectomy
NCT06110286 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Non-comparative Trial Following Participants Implanted Bilaterally With Mini WELL Toric Ready Intraocular Lens for 6 Months After the Second Eye Implant (FUSION)
NCT03861351 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Q Value Customized Versus Wavefront Optimized Ablation in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK
NCT04738903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Head-Mounted Spatial Computing and Three-Dimensional (3D) Visualization in Ocular Microsurgery: A Safety and Workflow Study
NCT07301385 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Limbal Astigmatic Keratotomy to Correct High Degrees of Astigmatism After Phacoemulsification
NCT06179355 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Visual Acuity After the Combined Binocular Implantation of +2.0 Diopters and +3.0 Diopters Oculentis Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.
NCT02633228 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Assessing the Astigmatism Reducing Effect With Toric IOLs in Eyeswith Low Astigmatism
NCT03538964 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Corneal Aberrations in Subjects With Contralateral AcrySof IQ Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL) and AcrySof IQ IOL With Limbal Relaxing Incision (LRI)
NCT01045733 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Purpose is to Evaluate Visual Acuity for Distance, Intermediate and Near and Additionally Contrast Sensitivity at 25% and 10% of Illumination After Implantation of Trifocal IOL, Extended Range of Vision IOL, Bifocal IOL With Low Addition and Monofocal IOL
NCT07008768 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Visual Quality and Performance of Eyes With Asqelio™ EDoF Toric Lenses
NCT06707545 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study on the Visual and Refractive Outcomes and Safety Outcomes Following Implantation of an AddOn Intraocular Lens in Previously Pseudophakic Eyes
NCT05596682 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Study to Confirm Safety and Performance of a New Multifocal IOL
NCT06247683 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Correlation Between Preoperative Refraction and Anterior Segment Parameters With ICL Vault
NCT05670626 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA