Visual Outcomes in Patients Contralaterally Implanted With PanOptix Pro and Clareon Vivity Compared to Bilateral Implantation of PanOptix Pro
NCT07076277 · Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 346
Last updated 2025-09-22
Summary
Title:
Visual Outcomes in Patients Contralaterally Implanted with PanOptix Pro and Clareon Vivity Compared to Bilateral Implantation of PanOptix Pro
Sponsor:
Brian Shafer, MD, Shafer Vision Institute
Objective:
To compare visual outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction in cataract patients receiving either:
Contralateral implantation (PanOptix Pro in one eye, Clareon Vivity in the other)
Bilateral PanOptix Pro implants
Key hypotheses:
Contralateral implantation is non-inferior for binocular best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) at 4 m.
Contralateral implantation yields superior visual disturbance outcomes (less halo, glare, starburst).
Design:
Prospective, randomized, double-masked, two-arm, multicenter study
N = 346 subjects (173 per arm)
5 surgeons across 4 sites
All patients undergo bilateral phacoemulsification aiming for emmetropia
Randomized 1:1 to:
Arm 1: PanOptix Pro (dominant eye) + Clareon Vivity (non-dominant eye)
Arm 2: Bilateral PanOptix Pro
Surgical Details:
Femtosecond laser optional
Second eye surgery ≤4 weeks after first
Toric IOLs or arcuate incisions for residual astigmatism ≤0.50 D
Biometry with ARGOS, IOLMaster 700, or Lenstar
Toric alignment with ORA, Callisto, etc.
Assessments:
Visual acuity at 4 m, 66 cm, 40 cm, 33 cm in photopic and mesopic conditions
Defocus curves, contrast sensitivity (with/without glare)
Manifest refraction
Patient-reported outcomes via IOLSAT and QUVID questionnaires
Masking: subjects and assessors unaware of IOL assignments
Endpoints (at 3 months):
Primary: Binocular BCDVA (4 m)
Secondary: DCIVA, DCNVA, UDVA, UIVA, UNVA, defocus curves, refractive outcomes, visual disturbance scores
Exploratory: Mesopic VA, low contrast VA, contrast sensitivity, satisfaction scores
Eligibility Criteria:
Adults with bilateral age-related cataracts
Plan for bilateral phacoemulsification
Expected postop monocular BCDVA ≤0.1 logMAR (20/25)
Residual astigmatism ≤0.50 D
Exclusions include corneal pathology, macular disease, glaucoma, prior ocular surgery, amblyopia, severe dry eye, high HOA (\>0.6 um), monovision preference, active infection/inflammation, pregnancy
Statistics:
Non-inferiority margin: 0.1 logMAR
Superiority testing for visual disturbances
Step-down testing hierarchy for primary and secondary outcomes
Sample size powered for 80% at α=0.05, accounting for 10% dropout
Two-proportion Z-tests for dysphotopsia rates
Safety Monitoring:
Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) captured
Definitions, severity grading, and reporting procedures specified
Protocol deviations documented and reported per IRB requirements
Data Handling:
Data anonymized via subject numbers
Stored securely (locked cabinets, password-protected systems)
Study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov
Visit Schedule:
Screening: Consent, eligibility, history
1st \& 2nd Eye Surgery Visits
3-Month Post-Op Visit: Comprehensive visual assessments, questionnaires, AE review
Conditions
- Cataract
- Multifocal Intraocular Lens
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Clareon PanOptix Pro and Clareon Vivity Intraocular Lens
Bilateral cataract surgery with contralateral implantation: Alcon Clareon PanOptix Pro (or PanOptix Pro Toric) intraocular lens in one eye and Alcon Clareon Vivity (or Vivity Toric) intraocular lens i
- DEVICE
-
Clareon PanOptix Pro Intraocular Lenses
Bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of Alcon Clareon PanOptix Pro (or PanOptix Pro Toric) intraocular lenses in both eyes. All surgeries target emmetropia with residual astigmatism ≤0.50 diopters using toric IOLs or arcuate incisions as needed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Brian Shafer
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Brian Shafer, MD · Shafer Vision Institute
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-08-05
- Primary Completion
- 2026-08-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-01
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Post Market Clinical Evaluation of Clareon PanOptix Pro and Clareon PanOptix Pro Toric IOLs
NCT07161635 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric
NCT05852470 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clareon PanOptix Pro vs. Clareon PanOptix - Study A
NCT06400745 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Clareon PanOptix Pro in Patients With Prior Myopic Refractive Surgery
NCT06555289 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical Outcomes of Clareon Vivity Intraocular Lens With Mini-Monovision Approach
NCT05821101 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Implantation of the Clareon Monofocal IOL With the New Clareon Manual Monarch IV IOL Delivery System
NCT05526781 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clareon PanOptix Versus AcrySof PanOptix : Prospective Study Comparing Contrast Sensitivity
NCT07158177 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Quality of Vision and Visual Outcomes With Bilateral Implantation of the Clareon PanOptix Intraocular Lens
NCT05518539 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clareon PanOptix Pro vs. Clareon PanOptix - Study B
NCT06401551 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Bilateral Implantation of Non-diffractive EDOF IOL Made of a New Hydrophobic Acrylic Material
NCT05488769 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Evaluation of Quality of Vision and Spectacle Independence With the AcrySof® Panoptix® Intraocular Lens
NCT04124952 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Implantation of a Trifocal Hydrophobic IOL in Patients That Underwent Refractive Surgery
NCT04054427 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Head-to-Head Comparison of Five Enhanced Depth of Focus IOLs and One Monofocal IOL
NCT07051720 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Panoptix Trifocal Lens in Post Refractive Myopic Laser Vision Correction Surgery
NCT04698278 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Vivity IOL: Emmetropia Compared to Monovision.
NCT05464732 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Spectacle Independence and Overall Satisfaction With AcrySof® Panoptix® Toric Intraocular Lens
NCT04128514 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Visual Performance of Clareon Vivity and PureSee IOL
NCT07165197 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Outcomes After Routine Cataract Extraction & Implantation of a Conventional or Spheric Intraocular Lens
NCT00366496 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Preference and Visual Quality With Contralateral Synergy Versus Panoptix
NCT05610540 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Investigation of the AcrySof IQ Vivity Extended Vision Intraocular Lens (IOL)
NCT04098367 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Model SC9 IOL Compared to the Model LI61SE IOL (Bausch & Lomb)
NCT03179397 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Visual Function After Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses (IOLs)
NCT01257217 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accommodation Measurements After Bilateral Implantation of an Aspheric Accommodating Lens and Monofocal Aspheric Lenses
NCT01241279 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Visual Acuity Outcome Differences Between the Alcon Vivity Toric IOL and RxSight LAL+
NCT06574646 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intermediate Vision in Patients With Clareon IOLs Compared to Eyhance IOLs
NCT05226884 ·Status: COMPLETED