Optimizing Alveolar Ridge Expansion
NCT07066930 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2025-07-15
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two surgical techniques-Magneto-Dynamic Ridge Splitting and Versah Osseodensification-for expanding narrow alveolar ridges in adults requiring dental implant placement. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Which technique better preserves alveolar bone width after surgery?
Which method results in higher primary implant stability?
Researchers will compare ridge splitting using the Magnetic Mallet to ridge expansion using Versah drills to see if one technique leads to better clinical outcomes, such as improved bone preservation, greater implant stability, and favorable soft tissue response.
Participants will:
Undergo ridge expansion surgery using either the Magnetic Mallet or Versah drills, followed by immediate dental implant placement.
Receive CBCT scans before and 4 months after surgery to measure bone changes.
Undergo implant stability testing using the ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) method.
Have intraoral scans to evaluate changes in soft tissue volume and thickness.
Conditions
- Dental Implant
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Magneto-Dynamic Ridge Expansion
A ridge expansion technique using the Magnetic Mallet device. Controlled magneto-dynamic impulses are applied to split the alveolar ridge and compact bone prior to immediate implant placement.
- PROCEDURE
-
Osseodensification with Versah Drills
A ridge expansion method using Versah drills (Densah burs) in osseodensification mode. The drills densify bone without removing it, enhancing bone density and implant stability. Arm Assignment: Versah Osseodensification (Active Comparator arm)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universidad de Granada
collaborator OTHER -
Hawler Medical University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jodal Ahmed, PhD · Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-05-01
- Completion
- 2026-06-01
Countries
- Iraq
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ridge Expansion by Osseodensification Simultaneously With Implant Placement in Narrow Alveolar Ridges
NCT03592381 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation Comparing an Intrasocket Graft Alone to an Intrasocket Graft Plus a Facial Overlay Graft
NCT01431131 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Minimally Invasive Subperiosteal Tunneling With Xenogenic Bone Graft and PRF
NCT07079917 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation in Molar Sites Comparing Xenograft Versus Mineralized Freeze-dried Bone Allograft
NCT05107141 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs Autologous Bone Blocks in the Lateral Augmentation of the Jaws
NCT07104370 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Different Treatment Modalities for Atrophied Distal Extension Maxillary Ridges
NCT05198687 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One Stage Ridge Splitting Using 2 Different Techniques in Maxilla
NCT06891261 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Collagen Material and Allograft
NCT04321109 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Narrow Alveolar Ridges Via Densah-bur Versus Piezoelectric
NCT04408781 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Titanium Mesh vs Customized PEEK Mesh for Horizontal Maxillary Ridge Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07002931 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Osseodensification Versus Alveolar Ridge Splitting
NCT06728202 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Dental Implants After Using Several Bone Splitting Techniques
NCT05720143 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mix of Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral: a Possible Solution for Alveolar Ridge Preservation?
NCT06275789 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Ridge Splitting of Horizontal Deficient in Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Ridge
NCT03533309 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Bone Allograft Particle Sizes on the Quantity and Quality of New Bone Formation in Grafted Extraction Sockets and Edentulous Ridges
NCT03468998 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Ridge Splitting Versus the Conventional Open Flap Technique
NCT06329362 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
SINUS FLOOR WITH OSSEODENSIFICATION OR LATERAL WINDOW
NCT06123221 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Putty Allograft vs. Putty Alloplast Graft
NCT05484492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ridge Augmentation Comparing a Block Allograft to a Demineralized Bone Matrix Allograft.
NCT02127112 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Management of Distally Extension Maxillary Atrophied Ridge With Two Different Minimal Invasive Treatment Modalities
NCT05646498 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic and Histomorphometric Assessment for Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Tooth Graft From Extracted Tooth Combined With Simvastatin 1:1 Versus Autogenous Tooth Graft
NCT06879171 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
GBR and Autogenous Bone Chips
NCT03946020 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Socket Grafting for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT01794806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
An RCT Comparing Xenograft and Allograft for Ridge Preservation
NCT02330523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of The Post-Extraction Dimensional Alterations Following Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Partially and Completely Demineralized Dentin Grafts Versus Autogenous Whole-tooth Graft
NCT05766137 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA