Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effectiveness of a Pender's Health Promotion Model-Based Diabetes Self-Management Program in Gestational Diabetes: A Clinical Trial (NCT NCT07060963)
NCT ID: NCT07060963
Last Updated: 2026-03-17
Results Overview
Health Belief Model Scale for Diabetes Patients (HBM) consists of 33 items and five subscales: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and recommended health activities. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1-5), and negative items are reverse-coded. The total score is calculated as the mean of all items, with a possible score range of 1-5. Higher scores indicate stronger health beliefs. The scale was administered to participants before the intervention (24-28 gestational weeks) and after completion of the intervention (36-38 gestational weeks).
COMPLETED
NA
71 participants
At 36-38 weeks of gestation
2026-03-17
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited between January and July 2025 from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of a university hospital in Ankara. Recruitment was carried out during routine antenatal outpatient clinic visits. Pregnant women between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation were identified through antenatal follow-up records and screened for eligibility according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Before group allocation, eligible participants were informed about the study and provided written informed consent. Baseline assessments, including sociodemographic data, obstetric history, maternal blood glucose measurements, and scale-based evaluations, were completed prior to randomization using standardized procedures. Only participants who completed baseline assessments were randomized, and no intervention was initiated before group assignment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
The group that received the diabetes self-management program based on the Pender's health promotion model
|
Routine Maintenance Standard
The group that did not receive the diabetes self-management program based on Pender's health promotion model
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
37
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
37
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Age of participants at baseline, reported as mean and standard deviation in years.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
n=37 Participants
The group that received the diabetes self-management program based on the Pender's health promotion model
Motivational interviews within the context of a health promotion-based diabetes self-management program: The researcher provided counseling services to pregnant women to provide Diabetes Self-Management Group training based on Pender's Health Promotion Model. A group was formed consisting of at least 10 people. The training was completed face-to-face and practically, in 1 day (160 minutes), in 4 sessions, each session being 40 minutes. Motivational interviews were conducted by the researcher within the scope of the health promotion-based diabetes self-management program. A second motivational interview was planned according to the determined need and the interviews were provided. Each interview lasted approximately 40 minutes. In order to ensure continuity for the pregnant women who obtained positive behavioral outcomes, reinforcement was provided by telephone interviews and the counseling process was completed.
|
Routine Maintenance Standard
n=34 Participants
The group that did not receive the diabetes self-management program based on Pender's health promotion model
|
Total
n=71 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants • Age of participants at baseline, reported as mean and standard deviation in years.
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Age of participants at baseline, reported as mean and standard deviation in years.
|
0 Participants
n=71 Participants • Age of participants at baseline, reported as mean and standard deviation in years.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
37 Participants
n=37 Participants • Age of participants at baseline, reported as mean and standard deviation in years.
|
34 Participants
n=34 Participants • Age of participants at baseline, reported as mean and standard deviation in years.
|
71 Participants
n=71 Participants • Age of participants at baseline, reported as mean and standard deviation in years.
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants • Age of participants at baseline, reported as mean and standard deviation in years.
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Age of participants at baseline, reported as mean and standard deviation in years.
|
0 Participants
n=71 Participants • Age of participants at baseline, reported as mean and standard deviation in years.
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
32.7 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 • n=37 Participants • Age data were analyzed for all enrolled participants at baseline (n = 71).
|
32.76 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.19 • n=34 Participants • Age data were analyzed for all enrolled participants at baseline (n = 71).
|
32.73 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.04 • n=71 Participants • Age data were analyzed for all enrolled participants at baseline (n = 71).
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
37 Participants
n=37 Participants • Sex data were analyzed for all enrolled participants at baseline (n = 71). All participants were pregnant women.
|
34 Participants
n=34 Participants • Sex data were analyzed for all enrolled participants at baseline (n = 71). All participants were pregnant women.
|
71 Participants
n=71 Participants • Sex data were analyzed for all enrolled participants at baseline (n = 71). All participants were pregnant women.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants • Sex data were analyzed for all enrolled participants at baseline (n = 71). All participants were pregnant women.
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Sex data were analyzed for all enrolled participants at baseline (n = 71). All participants were pregnant women.
|
0 Participants
n=71 Participants • Sex data were analyzed for all enrolled participants at baseline (n = 71). All participants were pregnant women.
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
|
37 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=71 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 36-38 weeks of gestationPopulation: Participants who completed both baseline and post-intervention assessments were included in the analysis. Analysis was conducted with 71 participants: 37 in the intervention group and 34 in the control group.
Health Belief Model Scale for Diabetes Patients (HBM) consists of 33 items and five subscales: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and recommended health activities. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1-5), and negative items are reverse-coded. The total score is calculated as the mean of all items, with a possible score range of 1-5. Higher scores indicate stronger health beliefs. The scale was administered to participants before the intervention (24-28 gestational weeks) and after completion of the intervention (36-38 gestational weeks).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
n=37 Participants
The group that received the diabetes self-management program based on the Pender's health promotion model
|
Routine Maintenance Standard
n=34 Participants
The group that did not receive the diabetes self-management program based on Pender's health promotion model
|
|---|---|---|
|
Health Belief Model Scale for Diabetes Patients
|
3.45 Score
Interval 2.0 to 4.24
|
3.42 Score
Interval 2.15 to 3.79
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 36-38 weeks of gestationPopulation: Participants who completed both baseline and post-intervention assessments were included in the analysis. Analysis was conducted with 71 participants: 37 in the intervention group and 34 in the control group.
The Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale for Gestational Diabetes consists of 23 items across four subscales: Diet-Weight Management, Complication Prevention, Adherence to Nutrition Education, and Medical Treatment Practices. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not confident at all, 5 = completely confident). Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy. The scale was administered to participants at baseline (24-28 gestational weeks) and after completion of the intervention (36-38 gestational weeks). The reported outcome represents the post-intervention score for each participant, calculated as the mean of all item scores (range 1-5). Data were not normally distributed, so medians and interquartile ranges were used to summarize. Results were analyzed using Robust ANOVA based on medians.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
n=37 Participants
The group that received the diabetes self-management program based on the Pender's health promotion model
|
Routine Maintenance Standard
n=34 Participants
The group that did not receive the diabetes self-management program based on Pender's health promotion model
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gestational Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale
|
4.09 Score
Interval 1.35 to 4.91
|
3.74 Score
Interval 1.7 to 4.52
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 36-38 weeks of gestationPopulation: Participants who completed both baseline and post-intervention assessments were included in the analysis. Analysis was conducted with 71 participants: 37 in the intervention group and 34 in the control group.
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support consists of 12 items and three subscales: Family, Friends, and Significant Other, each containing four items. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale. Subscale scores are calculated by summing the four items within each subscale (range 4-28), and the total score is obtained by summing all subscale scores (range 12-84). Higher scores indicate greater perceived social support. In this study, a total score of 42 and above was considered indicative of positive social support. The unit of measure is scale points. The scale was administered to participants before (24-28 gestational weeks) and after (36-38 gestational weeks) the intervention. The scale was administered before and after the intervention. Pre-test and post-test scores were analyzed in a single analysis using Robust ANOVA (medians) to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
n=37 Participants
The group that received the diabetes self-management program based on the Pender's health promotion model
|
Routine Maintenance Standard
n=34 Participants
The group that did not receive the diabetes self-management program based on Pender's health promotion model
|
|---|---|---|
|
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
|
78 Score
Interval 24.0 to 84.0
|
75 Score
Interval 17.0 to 84.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 36-38 weeks of gestationPopulation: Participants who completed both baseline and post-intervention assessments were included in the analysis. Analysis was conducted with 71 participants: 37 in the intervention group and 34 in the control group.
The Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale-II (HLBS-II) is a 52-item scale consisting of six subscales: health responsibility, physical activity, nutrition, spiritual growth, interpersonal relations, and stress management. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = never, 4 = routinely). Subscale scores are calculated by summing the items within each subscale. The total scale score ranges from 52 to 208, with higher scores indicating better healthy lifestyle behaviors. The scale was administered to participants before the education program (24-28 gestational weeks) and after completion of the intervention (36-38 gestational weeks). The reported outcome represents the post-intervention total score for each participant. Data were summarized using medians because scores were not normally distributed. Results were analyzed using Generalized Linear Models based on medians to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
n=37 Participants
The group that received the diabetes self-management program based on the Pender's health promotion model
|
Routine Maintenance Standard
n=34 Participants
The group that did not receive the diabetes self-management program based on Pender's health promotion model
|
|---|---|---|
|
Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale - II
|
151.36 score
Standard Deviation 25.61
|
137.63 score
Standard Deviation 21.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within the first 24 hours postpartumPopulation: The analysis population included pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus who were randomized to the intervention or control group and completed the study protocol. Analyses were conducted according to the per-protocol principle.
Maternal fasting blood glucose (mg/dL): A single outcome value for each participant was calculated as the mean of all measurements obtained at predefined follow-up time points during pregnancy (24-28, 28-32, and 32-36 gestational weeks) and within the first 24 hours postpartum. Unit of measure: mg/dL Statistical analysis: Robust ANOVA medians were used for comparison.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
n=37 Participants
The group that received the diabetes self-management program based on the Pender's health promotion model
|
Routine Maintenance Standard
n=34 Participants
The group that did not receive the diabetes self-management program based on Pender's health promotion model
|
|---|---|---|
|
Maternal Fastıng Blood Sugar Values
|
95 mg/dL
Interval 63.0 to 184.0
|
106 mg/dL
Interval 64.0 to 212.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within the first 24 hours postpartumPopulation: The analysis population included pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus who were randomized to the intervention or control group and completed the study follow-up. Analyses were conducted according to the per-protocol principle.
Maternal postprandial blood glucose (mg/dL): A single outcome value for each participant was calculated as the mean of all measurements obtained at predefined follow-up time points during pregnancy (24-28, 28-32, and 32-36 gestational weeks) and within the first 24 hours postpartum. Unit of measure: mg/dL Statistical analysis: Robust ANOVA medians were used for comparison.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
n=37 Participants
The group that received the diabetes self-management program based on the Pender's health promotion model
|
Routine Maintenance Standard
n=34 Participants
The group that did not receive the diabetes self-management program based on Pender's health promotion model
|
|---|---|---|
|
Maternal Postprandial Blood Sugar Values
|
113 mg/dl
Interval 86.0 to 218.0
|
128 mg/dl
Interval 100.0 to 247.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At the time of deliveryPopulation: All randomized participants who completed the study were included in the analysis. Participants were analyzed according to their originally assigned intervention and control groups.
Preterm labor was defined as delivery before 37 completed weeks of gestation. Results are presented as the percentage of participants experiencing preterm labor in each study group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
n=37 Participants
The group that received the diabetes self-management program based on the Pender's health promotion model
|
Routine Maintenance Standard
n=34 Participants
The group that did not receive the diabetes self-management program based on Pender's health promotion model
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Preterm Labor
|
1 Participants
Interval 63.0 to 158.0
|
8 Participants
Interval 64.0 to 192.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within the first 24 hours after birthPopulation: All live-born neonates delivered by participants who completed the study and had fasting blood glucose measurements within the first 24 hours after birth were included in the analysis.
Neonatal fasting blood glucose levels were measured from venous or capillary blood samples within the first 24 hours after birth to assess early neonatal glycemic status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
n=37 Participants
The group that received the diabetes self-management program based on the Pender's health promotion model
|
Routine Maintenance Standard
n=34 Participants
The group that did not receive the diabetes self-management program based on Pender's health promotion model
|
|---|---|---|
|
Neonatal Fasting Blood Glucose Measurements
|
63 mg/dl
Interval 40.0 to 85.0
|
61 mg/dl
Interval 39.0 to 86.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within the first 24 hours after birthPopulation: All live-born neonates delivered by participants who completed the study and had available postprandial blood glucose measurements within the first 24 hours after birth were included in the analysis.
Postprandial blood glucose levels measured in neonates born to study participants. Measurements were obtained after feeding within the first 24 hours following birth to assess neonatal glycemic response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
n=37 Participants
The group that received the diabetes self-management program based on the Pender's health promotion model
|
Routine Maintenance Standard
n=34 Participants
The group that did not receive the diabetes self-management program based on Pender's health promotion model
|
|---|---|---|
|
Neonatal Postprandial Blood Glucose Measurements
|
71 mg/dl
Interval 44.0 to 94.0
|
70 mg/dl
Interval 41.0 to 109.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At the time of deliveryPopulation: All randomized participants who completed delivery and whose neonatal birth weight data were available were included in the analysis.
Neonatal birth weight was measured immediately after delivery. Macrosomia was defined as a birth weight of 4000 grams or greater. The outcome was recorded as presence or absence of macrosomia for each study group. Results are reported as both the number and percentage of participants. The unit of measure is number of participants and percentage of participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
n=37 Participants
The group that received the diabetes self-management program based on the Pender's health promotion model
|
Routine Maintenance Standard
n=34 Participants
The group that did not receive the diabetes self-management program based on Pender's health promotion model
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number and Percentage of Participants With Macrosomia (Birth Weight ≥ 4000 Grams)
|
6 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Motivational Interviewing Within the Context of a Health Promotion-based Diabetes mellitüs
Routine Maintenance Standard
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place