MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Extended Cryoablation, Standard Cryoablation, and Radiofrequency Ablation

NCT07034378 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 288

Last updated 2025-06-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The objective of this study is to test the efficacy hypothesis that extended cryoballoon ablation is superior to either standard cryoballoon ablation or radiofrequency ablation

Conditions

  • Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Radiofrequency ablation

Radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins

PROCEDURE

Extended cryoballoon ablation

Cryoablation of pulmonary veins + posterior wall isolation

PROCEDURE

Standard cryoballoon ablation

Standard cryoablation of pulmonary veins

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Asan Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-09-28
Primary Completion
2025-02-28
Completion
2025-02-28

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07034378 on ClinicalTrials.gov