Intrauterine Balloon (Bakri©) Versus Uterine Tamponade With Chitosan Gauze (Celox PPH©) in the Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage Refractory to Medical Treatmen

NCT06996808 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 196

Last updated 2025-06-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. It is defined as blood loss of more than 500 mL after vaginal delivery or more than 1000 mL after cesarean section, but severe PPH is typically identified when blood loss exceeds 1000 mL regardless of delivery mode. The initial management of PPH includes the administration of uterotonics such as oxytocin, methylergometrine, and tranexamic acid. However, a subset of patients remains unresponsive to medical therapy, necessitating second-line interventions to avoid escalation to invasive procedures such as uterine artery embolization or peripartum hysterectomy.

An intrauterine balloon tamponade device (Bakri©), is commonly used as a mechanical method to control uterine bleeding by exerting direct pressure on the uterine walls. Its use has been widely adopted and incorporated into international guidelines due to its relative ease of use and safety profile. Despite its effectiveness, the failure rate of Bakri balloon placement can range from 20% to 40%, especially in cases of coagulopathy or diffuse atony.

Gauzes with a chitosan-based hemostatic dressing (Celox PPH ©) , has been extensively used in trauma settings and is increasingly being explored for surgical and obstetric applications. Its mechanism involves promoting clot formation independent of the clotting cascade, making it potentially beneficial in patients with coagulopathies. Preliminary data and case reports suggest that Celox PPH© may be effective in controlling intrauterine bleeding when used as a packing material after vaginal or cesarean delivery, but no high-quality randomized controlled trial has yet compared it directly with standard interventions.

Given the clinical need for alternative second-line treatments for PPH unresponsive to medical therapy, this study proposes a head-to-head comparison of the Bakri balloon and Celox gauze. The findings will help inform evidence-based guidelines and may offer new strategies to reduce maternal transfusion requirements, prevent hysterectomy, and shorten hospital stays in patients experiencing severe PPH.

Conditions

  • Postpartum Hemorrhage

Interventions

DEVICE

Bakri Baloon

Bakri Balloon Standard insertion and inflation as per hospital protocol following delivery.

DEVICE

Celox gauze

Celox gauze will be placed intrauterine according to manufacturer instructions, post-vaginal or cesarean delivery. Duration and removal will follow standardized clinical guidelines

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Roma La Sapienza

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-09-01
Primary Completion
2028-09-01
Completion
2029-01-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06996808 on ClinicalTrials.gov