Mobile Education and Telephone Monitoring for ICD Patients: Effects on Anxiety, Acceptance, and Self-Efficacy
NCT06935526 · Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 88
Last updated 2025-04-20
Summary
Aim: This study was conducted to determine the effect of a mobile education program and telephone monitoring developed for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) on shock anxiety, device acceptance, and self-efficacy.
Method: The study was designed as a single-blind, randomized controlled trial consisting of two phases. In the first phase, the Mobile ICD Education Program (M-ICDEP) was developed. In the second phase, the effectiveness of M-ICDEP was evaluated through a randomized controlled design with 88 ICD patients who attended routine battery check-ups.
Research data were collected through the mobile education program using the Personal Information Form, Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS), Florida Patient Acceptance Scale (FPAS), and the Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Scales After ICD Implantation (OE-ICD and SB-ICD). Additionally, patients underwent a shock management simulation via M-ICDEP, and their data were assessed using the Shock Management Control Form, which was included in the evaluation of shock anxiety.
Patients in both the intervention and control groups used M-ICDEP for three months. The control group had access only to the brief educational booklet section containing general information, while the intervention group had access to all sections. Patients in the intervention group also received telephone follow-ups during the second, fifth, and eighth weeks of the monitoring period. Data were collected twice: once before the intervention (pre-test) and once in the third month (post-test). Statistical analyses will conducted using the SAS 9.4 software package.
Conditions
- Patient Acceptance of Health Care
- Nursing
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)
- Self-Efficacy
- Shock, Cardiogenic
Interventions
- OTHER
-
The mobile training program and telephone follow-ups
The study had three phases: pre-test, implementation, and post-test. Data were collected twice, before the intervention and in the third month, using validated scales and a shock management simulation via the mobile training program (M-ICDEP). M-ICDEP included three sections: an educational section, a two-page summary, and a shock management simulation. All sections were shared with the intervention group. After the pre-test, intervention group patients could log in to M-ICDEP anytime using their email and password, accessing content repeatedly during the three-month follow-up. The researcher conducted telephone follow-ups in the second, fifth, and eighth weeks, evaluating patients using the Telephone Calls Monitoring Form. The information given to the patients during the telephone conversation was continued within the limited of the training program prepared within the scope of M-ICDEP.
- OTHER
-
Only a two-page summary section of M-ICDEP
The study had three phases: pre-test, implementation, and post-test. Data were collected twice, before the intervention and in the third month, using validated scales and a shock management simulation via the mobile training program (M-ICDEP). M-ICDEP included three sections: an educational section, a two-page summary, and a shock management simulation. Only a two-page summary section were shared with the control group. After the pre-test, control group patients could log in to M-ICDEP anytime using their email and password, accessing the summary section repeatedly during the three-month follow-up. Routine outpatient follow-up was continued for the control group without any other intervention.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Koç University
collaborator OTHER -
Akdeniz University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mediha SERT GÖKÇEBEL, Researcher · Akdeniz University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-09-26
- Primary Completion
- 2024-12-26
- Completion
- 2025-06-30
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Internet-based Intervention in Cardioverter-defibrillator Patients to Enhance Quality of Life
NCT00895700 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life and Device Acceptance in Patients With ICD Undergoing Remote ICD FU
NCT02888028 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Screening and Intervention Reducing Anxiety in Patients With Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)
NCT02713360 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Heart-focused Anxiety in Patients With Heart Failure and ICD
NCT02226770 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Mindfulness-based Intervention for Treatment of Anxiety in ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) Patients
NCT01035294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Decision Support for Adults Facing Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Pulse Generator Replacement
NCT02668900 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
An Intervention to Improve Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Deactivation Conversations
NCT01459744 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient-Reported Quality of Life in Patients With an Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillator - A Longitudinal Observational Study
NCT06654284 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
A Study of Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) and Their Caregivers
NCT01454817 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient-Reported Quality of Life in Patients With an Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillator - A Cross-Sectional Observational Study
NCT06654232 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Pilot Trial of Patient Decision Aids for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs)
NCT02026102 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Barriers to Use of Remote Monitoring in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
NCT02361333 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD)/Device Expectations, Adaptations, and Successes Study
NCT01040988 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Interventional Study of Anxiety Symptoms in the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Patient
NCT00851071 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
An Intervention to Impact Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Lead Models Implanted in Veterans
NCT05062434 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Trial of Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Versus Quarterly Device Interrogations in Clinic
NCT00606567 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality
NCT00541268 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment Satisfaction in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients
NCT01230073 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Multicenter Trial of a Shared DECision Support Intervention for Patients Offered Implantable Cardioverter-DEfibrillators
NCT03374891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Developing a Digital Aid to Improve ICD Decisions
NCT07084142 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Expectations After Implantable-cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Implantation
NCT00845390 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety of Smartphones Among Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
NCT01819896 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical and Device Functional Assessment of Real World ICD Patients
NCT02341768 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Prophylactic ICD Versus Non-ICD Therapy
NCT06543446 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
In-depth Interviews of Patients With ICDs
NCT07258602 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION