MedTrace Logo

Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women：A Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT06885788 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 466

Last updated 2025-03-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to compare the clinical effects of uterine round ligament preservation versus resection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women.The primary outcomes included Time required for patient surgery.The secondary outcomes included Inguinal hernia recurrence,quality of life assessment,Indicators of postoperative recovery,, et al.

Conditions

  • Inguinal Hernia
  • Laparoscopic Surgery
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Interventions

PROCEDURE

To remove the uterine uterine ligament

Both groups underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The preservation group retained the uterine round ligament, while the resection group had it removed.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Nanchong Central Hospital

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-09-20
Primary Completion
2026-12-31
Completion
2027-03-01

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06885788 on ClinicalTrials.gov