The Effect of Needle Insertion Angle on Contrast Distribution and Treatment Outcomes in S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections
NCT06801990 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 66
Last updated 2025-01-30
Summary
Nerve compression due to lumbar disc herniation (lumbosacral radiculopathy) is a condition characterized by pain in the lower back and legs and restricted lumbar joint movement due to the compression of nerves emerging from the lumbar spine caused by the protrusion of the intervertebral disc. Back pain negatively impacts patients' quality of life and emotional well-being. Treatment approaches aim to alleviate pain, improve joint mobility, and restore functionality through the use of pain-relief medications (topical or oral), physical therapy methods, and rehabilitation programs that include exercises for range of motion, stretching, and strengthening. When these approaches prove insufficient, interventional procedures (injection therapy) or surgical interventions come to the forefront.
One of the proven interventional treatment methods for herniated disc disease is the transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESE), which involves the injection of cortisone around the compressed nerve due to the herniation and is frequently performed in our clinic. Transforaminal injections require imaging guidance and the use of contrast media to enhance the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. To visualize the S1 foramen, needle entry is performed using various angles under fluoroscopy guidance. This study will investigate the effect of the needle entry angle on the spread and pattern of contrast media, complications, and treatment outcomes in fluoroscopy-guided S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injections. The research aims to determine whether the needle entry angle influences the pattern of contrast spread and the treatment outcomes in S1 TFESE.
Based on the findings of this study, the goal is to refine the procedure for patients requiring injections at this level in the future, optimizing the technique and clinical outcomes. This will provide essential insights to practitioners, maximize the benefits for the patient group undergoing the procedure, and make a significant contribution to medical science. Detailed information regarding the planned injection therapy by your algology specialist will be provided, and written and verbal consent will be obtained through the "Epidural Steroid Injection Consent Form." Various scales and questionnaires will be administered at specific intervals-prior to the procedure, 1 hour after, 3 weeks after, and 3 months after-to evaluate pain levels, treatment response, and the impact on daily activities. The content of these evaluations will be explained in detail by your physician.
Temporary side effects related to the injection may include increased pain at the injection site, low blood pressure, dizziness, fainting, and allergic reactions, all of which can be managed with appropriate treatment. Although rare, severe side effects such as nerve damage, spinal cord injury, or stroke have been reported in some cases. However, adherence to the guidelines outlined in treatment protocols and the performance of the procedure by adequately trained and experienced physicians significantly reduce the likelihood of these serious side effects. This injection will be performed by an algology specialist with at least 10 years of experience in this field. All necessary precautions will be taken against potential side effects, and the performing team will provide immediate medical intervention in case of complications.
Approximately 66 volunteers will participate in this study, with each follow-up evaluation expected to take about 15 minutes. The identities of participants will remain confidential, and they have the right to withdraw from the study at any time by notifying the researchers. If deemed necessary by the researchers, participants may also be excluded from the study. If a participant declines to participate or is excluded from the study, their treatment will not be interrupted. Participants will not bear any financial responsibility for research-related expenses, and no additional travel costs will be incurred as evaluations will coincide with regular clinic visits.
Conditions
- Low Back Pain (LBP)
- Lumbar Radiculopathy
- Intravascular Injection
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
S1 transforaminal epidural steroid(dexamethasone) injection
The designed study will examine the effect of oblique entry angles on contrast distribution patterns and treatment outcomes. Therefore, it aims to compare the smallest and largest angles that can be achieved under co-axial imaging at the S1 foramen. For this purpose, patients will be divided into two groups through randomization using a computer program. In the first group, after angling cranially and visualizing the foramen, the needle entry point will be determined. In the second group, after achieving optimal imaging by cranially angling the C-arm fluoroscope, an additional ipsilateral oblique angle will be applied to the fluoroscope. In this context, Plastaras et al. reported that an angle of 5° ± 5° is the most suitable range for the S1 foramen. Additionally, another study examining dorsal and ventral S1 foramen via tomography images found that the average angle providing the widest view of the dorsal foramen was 26.6° ± 3°. In the current study, no oblique angle will be applied
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Marmara University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-09-09
- Primary Completion
- 2025-10-01
- Completion
- 2025-12-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Caudal Versus S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral S1 Radiculopathy
NCT05711121 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Relief of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Symptoms
NCT06393959 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Transforaminal Epidural Injections in Lumbar Disc Herniation or Radiculitis
NCT01052571 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transforaminal and Parasagittal Approach in Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection
NCT05551676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection in Radicular Low Back Pain According to MSU Classification
NCT06275529 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Epidural Neuroplasty for the Treatment of Herniated Lumbar Disk
NCT03101033 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Epidural Steroid Injections in Post-lumbar Surgery Syndrome After Single-level Discectomy
NCT05099796 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Incidence of the Intravascular Injection During S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection in Two Approaches: Medial vs Lateral in Anteroposterior View
NCT02867046 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Cervical Parameters to Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Cervical Disc Herniation
NCT05374850 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Transforaminal Epidural Injection
NCT04212845 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Microendoscopic Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections
NCT05729022 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Transforaminal vs. Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Injection
NCT02838615 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections for Low Back Pain/Sciatic Lumbar Pain
NCT01407913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Glucocorticoid Injection in Patients With Lumbar Radicular Pain
NCT05571046 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Effect of Magnesium Deficiency on Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection Success: An Observational Study
NCT06551792 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Corticosteroid Injection(s) Versus Defined Physical Therapy
NCT01443819 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Epidural Contrast Flow Patterns of TESI Using the Inferior-Anterior Position as the Final Needle Tip Position.
NCT01836770 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Transforaminal Epidural Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Epidural Steroid Injection for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain
NCT05129085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy of Radiofrequency Nucleoplasty and Targeted Disc Decompression in Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT02025283 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Microendoscopic Discectomy Vs Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Vs Open Discectomy
NCT02358291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
The Aim of Study is to Identify the Predictive Factors for the Success of Transforaminal Epidural Injection in Treatment of Patients with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
NCT06795542 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Transforaminal Versus Lateralized Interlaminar Cervical Epidurals
NCT03389620 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Mechanical Diagnosis and Treatment and/or Steroid Injections for Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT02951377 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
CT Guided Injection for Low Back Radiculopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT01267825 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Steroid Injections Given at the "Level of MRI Pathology" Versus at the "Level of Clinical Symptoms" to See if One is More Effective Than the Other.
NCT02196883 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA