MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Conventional Respiratory Physiotherapy and the Simeox Device in Patients With Bronchiectasis

NCT06801327 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2026-03-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Physiotherapy is a key treatment for patients with bronchiectasis. An evaluation of the parameters indicative of respiratory health in patients treated with two different respiratory physiotherapy techniques (conventional versus Simeox®) would be very useful in choosing physiotherapy treatments for bronchiectasis patients. A systematic review of the literature shows that there are no published studies evaluating the effectiveness of respiratory physiotherapy by analyzing the variation in resistance measured using the forced oscillation technique (FOT) in patients with bronchiectasis. The results of this study would add to those that have examined different physiotherapy techniques and could therefore contribute to the choice of the most appropriate technique for this category of patients.

The trial is being conducted to answer the question: "How do respiratory parameters vary during treatment with two different respiratory physiotherapy techniques: conventional respiratory physiotherapy or that performed using the Simeox device?" Secondary objectives include the measurement of various functional parameters, such as vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, blood oxygenation, blood pressure values) and spirometry values (FEV1, FVC, TLC). The onset of adverse events, the degree of patient tolerance and relief, and respiratory health will also be assessed through the administration of various questionnaires commonly used in clinical practice. Additionally, changes in the quantity of sputum produced will be measured.

Conditions

  • Bronchiectasis Adult

Interventions

DEVICE

Simeox

The Investigators chose to evaluate this device for respiratory physiotherapy in our patients because it is the only one that offers innovative technology, as, unlike other commercially available devices, it does not require the patient to perform forced breathing. Instead, the patient can exhale calmly at tidal volume. This is expected to reduce the patient's effort and improve compliance with treatment. Furthermore, the vibratory signal with small, rapid, and sequential depressions within the airways could be more effective in mobilizing mucus from the airways, preventing collapse.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Stefano Nava, MD · IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-12-01
Primary Completion
2026-09-01
Completion
2026-12-01

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06801327 on ClinicalTrials.gov