MedTrace Logo

The Use of CCK vs PS in Revision TKAs

NCT06782295 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 170

Last updated 2025-11-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to compare the clinical impact of Constrained Condylar versus Posterior Stabilized Knee (PS) bearings on patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes including mid-term survivorship among patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty.

Conditions

  • Aseptic Loosening of Prosthetic Joint
  • Instability of Prosthetic Joint
  • Reimplantation for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
  • Femoral Revision Indicated
  • Tibial Component Revision

Interventions

DEVICE

Constrained Condylar bearing

Patients in this intervention will receive a CCK bearing component

DEVICE

posterior stabilized bearing

Patients in this intervention will receive a PS bearing component

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Rush University Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-07-01
Primary Completion
2028-07-01
Completion
2038-07-01
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06782295 on ClinicalTrials.gov