Comparison of Ultrasound with Fluoroscopy to Assess Diaphragmatic Paralysis After Congenital Heart Disease Surgery

NCT06766045 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 41

Last updated 2025-01-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Diaphragmatic paralysis after congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery can increase patient mortality and morbidity, especially for the vulnerable pediatric patient. Establishing a diagnosis of this disorder is key for making follow-up decisions such as diaphragm plication. Fluoroscopy as the gold standard has limitations in assessing diaphragmatic paralysis after CHD surgery Objective: To compare diaphragmatic ultrasound with fluoroscopy as the diagnostic method for diaphragmatic paralysis after CHD surgery.

Conditions

  • Diaphragmatic Paralysis

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Diaphragmatic Ultrasound

Diaphragmatic ultrasound was performed bedside in the ICU with supine position. Diaphragmatic thickness was measured by placing the ultrasound on 8th-10th intercostal space between anterior and mid-axillary line with marker at 12 o'clock. B-mode ultrasound was used to measure the distance between thoracic and abdominal diaphragm which resulted in the diaphragmatic thickness at inspiration (DTi) and diaphragmatic thickness at expiration (DTe). The ultrasound was then placed on the subcostal area between anterior and mid-axillary line with marker at 12 o'clock to observe the diaphragmatic motion on each side. Measurement of diaphragmatic excursion as well as recording and evaluation of diaphragmatic sliding and motion were performed during both inspiration and expiration using M-mode.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Fluoroscopy

Fluoroscopy test was conducted in cathlab with supine position and anteroposterior (AP) projection for at least 5 breathing cycles. The fluoroscopy recording was then expertised and interpreted by the pediatric cardiologist in charge.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital Indonesia

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-06-01
Primary Completion
2024-05-31
Completion
2024-07-31

Countries

  • Indonesia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06766045 on ClinicalTrials.gov