Dry Needling vs. Stretching for Non-Specific Low Back Pain
NCT06756776 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 44
Last updated 2025-06-15
Summary
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the common health issues and a leading cause of reduced mobility. It is characterized by pain during functional activities and is often associated with hamstring tightness. CLBP affects individuals across all age groups. Various methods are used to address low back pain, including manual therapy. Manual therapy techniques include Maitland mobilizations, Kaltenborn mobilizations, Mulligan techniques, stretching, and others.
Several stretching techniques have been proposed, including static stretching, dynamic stretching, ballistic stretching, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF). Among these, static and dynamic stretching are the most commonly used methods. Static stretching is considered one of the safest and easiest techniques, which can be performed passively or actively. Literature supports that stretching improves muscle flexibility, provides relaxation, reduces pain, and increases the range of motion (ROM).
Dry needling is another physical intervention technique that has been utilized for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Current literature supports the use of dry needling for trigger points in hamstring muscles, which is a contributing factor to low back pain.
The objective of this study is to compare the effects of dry needling and stretching combined with sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) on pain, ROM, muscle length, and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain.
A randomized clinical trial will be conducted at Hijaz Hospital using convenience sampling to recruit participants. Patients will be allocated into two groups (Group A and Group B) through simple random sampling using sealed opaque envelopes. After conventional treatment, Group A will receive SNAGs and stretching, while Group B will receive SNAGs and dry needling.
Outcome measures will include the goniometer for ROM, the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI) for disability, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain, and the Finger-to-Floor Distance Test for hamstring flexibility. These measures will be assessed at baseline, at the 2nd week, and after 4 weeks. Data will be analyzed using SPSS software (version 21).
The normality of the data will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Based on the results, parametric or non-parametric tests will be used for within-group and between-group comparisons. SNAGs and dry needling will be evaluated for their effectiveness in treating non-specific low back pain.
Conditions
- Non Specific Low Back Pain
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Hot pack
The Hot Pack is a therapeutic intervention device designed to deliver localized heat to targeted areas of the body for a duration of 15 minutes. It provides deep, soothing heat that helps to relax muscles, increase blood circulation, and reduce pain and stiffness. The device is typically used to treat conditions such as muscle tension, joint pain, and chronic discomfort. By applying consistent heat, the Hot Pack promotes improved tissue flexibility and alleviates muscle spasms. It is user-friendly, ensuring safe and effective use when applied to affected areas, with adjustable heat settings to accommodate individual needs.
- OTHER
-
Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAG)
The Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAG) technique for the lumbar spine will be applied to participants in both groups. Participants will assume a stride standing position. The therapist will stand behind the participant as described by Mulligan, supporting the patient during the application of the technique and ensuring the required movement can be performed easily. The therapist will apply the mobilizing force parallel to the facet joint plane (in the cephalic direction) over the spinous processes of the respective symptomatic spinal levels in a sustained manner while the patient performs trunk flexion. The flexion position will be maintained for a few seconds, after which the participant will return to the starting position, with the therapist continuing to maintain the mobilizing force. Three sets of six repetitions will be performed on each symptomatic lumbar spinal level.
- OTHER
-
Passive Hamstring (HM) stretching
Passive Hamstring (HM) stretching will be performed by a physical therapist experienced in the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP) and trained in the study protocol. The procedure will follow manual therapy stretching standards \[22\]. First, the physical therapist will explain the procedure to the participant and reassure them that the stretching can be stopped if it becomes too difficult to tolerate. With the participant lying supine, the stretched limb will be placed in maximal, pain-free hip flexion with the knee flexed. The physical therapist will then slowly and gradually extend the knee to the maximal pain-free position. In this position, participants should feel an intense stretching sensation in the back of the thigh. If this position causes pain in the lower back, the hip flexion will be reduced to the maximal, pain-free range of motion (ROM). A stopwatch will be used to ensure that the final position is held for 1 minute for each limb.
- OTHER
-
Dry needling
Subjects will be positioned prone on a treatment table with their feet over the edge of the table. Dry needling (DN) will be applied to the hamstring muscles at three locations, each for 1 minute, using a fast in-out, cone-shaped technique. Subjects will receive DN three times a week. To standardize the approach and optimize the application of DN, the points will be located approximately close to the motor points of the hamstring muscles. Two of the locations are in the long and short heads of the biceps femoris, at points located at 30% and 60% of a straight line from the ischial tuberosity to the fibular head. For the semitendinosus and semitendinosus muscles, the DN location will be selected at 60% of a straight line from the ischial tuberosity to the medial femoral epicondyle. Disposable sterilized stainless steel needles (0.3×60 mm; DongBang AcuPrime Ltd, Korea) will be used.
- DEVICE
-
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
The TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation) unit is a therapeutic device designed to alleviate pain through the use of electrical impulses. It works by delivering low-voltage electrical currents via electrodes placed on the skin, targeting the affected area. These electrical pulses help to block pain signals sent to the brain and stimulate the production of endorphins, the body's natural pain relievers. The TENS unit is commonly used for managing both acute and chronic pain conditions, including muscle pain, joint pain, and nerve-related discomfort. The device is adjustable, allowing users to customize the intensity, duration, and frequency of the electrical stimulation to meet their individual needs. It is non-invasive, easy to use, and can be applied at home or in clinical settings for effective pain management.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Riphah International University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Danish Hassan, PhD* · Riphah International University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-07-15
- Primary Completion
- 2024-12-30
- Completion
- 2025-01-30
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition, Muscle Energy and Strain Counter Strain Techniques in Neck Pain
NCT05262062 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cervical SNAG Half Rotation Technique in Cervicogenic Headache Patients.
NCT04788160 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Thoracic Manipulation and Muscle Energy Technique in Non-specific Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT05315076 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cross Body vs Sleeper Stretch on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Performance in Cricket Bowlers.
NCT06240819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Diaphragm Manual Therapy Verses Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide in Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT06460532 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Myofascial Release With and Without Autogenic Inhibition Muscle Energy Technique in Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain
NCT07331571 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides Versus Cervical Manipulation on Pain and Disability in Wrestle
NCT05474456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Shi Style Cervical Mobilization Versus SNAGS in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache
NCT06459726 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Of Direct Myofascial Release And Bowen's Technique For Non-Specific Neck Pain
NCT05074641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effects of Myofascial Decompression and Positional Release Therapies in Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
NCT05947214 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Lower Trapezius Strengthening Versus Scapular Mobility Exercise Among Snooker Players in Unilateral Neck Pain
NCT06697002 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mulligan SNAG Versus Active Release Technique in Cervicogenic Headache
NCT07132047 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dry Needling and Maitland Joint Mobilization Techniques in Patients With Myofacial Chronic Neck Pain
NCT04568915 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Dry Needling in Patients With Upper Cross Syndrome
NCT04674904 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Median Nerve Flossing Technique in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy
NCT07062718 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Thoracic SNAGS on Vitals Among Individuals With Forward Head Posture
NCT06340477 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing the Effects of Sub-Occipital Myofascial Release With and Without SNAG on People With Cervicogenic Dizziness.
NCT07062809 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Muscle Activity and Kinematic Changes With Dry Needling
NCT04295200 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Deep Neck Flexors Training Versus Muscle Energy Technique on Cervicogenic Headache
NCT05754931 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sustained Natural Apophysial Glide Versus Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT06720116 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Combined Neural Mobilization With Manual Myofascial Release for Sciatic Pain Relief
NCT06947785 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Symmetrical Scapula-pelvis Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Superficial Back Line in Chronic Neck Pain With Hamstring Tightness
NCT07332845 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Spinal Mobilization With Arm Movement and Positional SNAGS in Cervical Radiculopathy Patients
NCT05191537 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Sub Occipital Muscle Inhibition Technique on Hamstring Flexibility in Post-laminectomy Patients
NCT06584682 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Neural Tension Versus Neural Sliding Technique on Cervical Radiculopathy.
NCT05959330 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA