MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between the Robot-assisted System AVIAR (MX-02) Procedure and Conventional Manual Procedure in Patients Requiring Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

NCT06735716 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2024-12-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The objective of this study is to compare and evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted procedures using the positioning catheter control device 'AVIAR (MX-02)' versus conventional manual procedures in patients with Stable angina requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Conditions

  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • LN Robotics inc.

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Asan Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Tae-Oh kim · Asan Medical Center

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-01-15
Primary Completion
2025-12-31
Completion
2026-03-30

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06735716 on ClinicalTrials.gov