Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparing Visual Outcomes in Matched Patients Receiving a Low Cylinder Power Toric IOL or a Non-toric IOL (NCT NCT06717607)

NCT ID: NCT06717607

Last Updated: 2026-06-15

Results Overview

Uncorrected distance visual acuty in logMAR

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

43 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

3 months

Results posted on

2026-06-15

Participant Flow

Unit of analysis: Eyes

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Clareon T2 IOL Implantation
Clareon T2 (low cylinder) toric IOL implanted
Clareon Non-toric IOL Implantation
The Clareon aspheric (non-toric) IOL was implanted
Overall Study
STARTED
25 30
18 20
Overall Study
COMPLETED
25 30
18 20
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0 0
0 0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Age was considered by participant, rather than eye.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Clareon T2 IOL Implantation
n=25 Participants
Clareon T2 (low cylinder) toric IOL implanted
Clareon Non-toric IOL Implantation
n=18 Participants
The Clareon aspheric (non-toric) IOL was implanted
Total
n=43 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
74 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6 • n=25 Participants • Age was considered by participant, rather than eye.
73 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 • n=18 Participants • Age was considered by participant, rather than eye.
74 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 • n=43 Participants • Age was considered by participant, rather than eye.
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
n=25 Participants • Sex was considered by participant, rather than eye.
11 Participants
n=18 Participants • Sex was considered by participant, rather than eye.
24 Participants
n=43 Participants • Sex was considered by participant, rather than eye.
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants
n=25 Participants • Sex was considered by participant, rather than eye.
7 Participants
n=18 Participants • Sex was considered by participant, rather than eye.
19 Participants
n=43 Participants • Sex was considered by participant, rather than eye.
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment
Norway
25 Participants
n=25 Participants
18 Participants
n=18 Participants
43 Participants
n=43 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Uncorrected distance visual acuty in logMAR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clareon Non-toric IOL Implantation
n=20 Eyes
The Clareon aspheric (non-toric) IOL was implanted
Clareon T2 IOL Implantation
n=30 Eyes
Clareon T2 (low cylinder) toric IOL implanted
UDVA
0.09 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.13
0 logMAR
Standard Deviation .08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Manifest refractive cylinder, in diopters

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clareon Non-toric IOL Implantation
n=20 Eyes
The Clareon aspheric (non-toric) IOL was implanted
Clareon T2 IOL Implantation
n=30 Eyes
Clareon T2 (low cylinder) toric IOL implanted
Manifest Refractive Cylinder
0.59 Dioptres
Standard Deviation .28
0.23 Dioptres
Standard Deviation .22

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

the percentage of eyes with \<= 0.25 D of postoperative refractive cylinder

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clareon Non-toric IOL Implantation
n=20 Eyes
The Clareon aspheric (non-toric) IOL was implanted
Clareon T2 IOL Implantation
n=30 Eyes
Clareon T2 (low cylinder) toric IOL implanted
Percentage of Eyes With <= 0.25 D of Refractive Cylinder
4 Eyes
22 Eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

The percentage of eyes with \<= 0.50 D of refractive cylinder

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clareon Non-toric IOL Implantation
n=20 Eyes
The Clareon aspheric (non-toric) IOL was implanted
Clareon T2 IOL Implantation
n=30 Eyes
Clareon T2 (low cylinder) toric IOL implanted
Percentage of Eyes With <= 0.50 D of Refractive Cylinder
11 Eyes
29 Eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), logMAR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clareon Non-toric IOL Implantation
n=20 Eyes
The Clareon aspheric (non-toric) IOL was implanted
Clareon T2 IOL Implantation
n=30 Eyes
Clareon T2 (low cylinder) toric IOL implanted
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity
-0.04 logMAR
Standard Deviation .07
-0.07 logMAR
Standard Deviation .05

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Mesopic log contrast sensitivity by spatial frequency - cycles per degree (CPD), using the Clinical Trial Suite (CTS) from M\&S Technologies (Niles, IL, 129 USA)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clareon Non-toric IOL Implantation
n=20 Eyes
The Clareon aspheric (non-toric) IOL was implanted
Clareon T2 IOL Implantation
n=30 Eyes
Clareon T2 (low cylinder) toric IOL implanted
Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity
12 CPD
-0.25 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.63
-0.23 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.57
Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity
6 CPD
-1.17 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.33
-1.21 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.25
Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity
3 CPD
-1.72 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.30
-1.76 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.24
Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity
1.5 CPD
-1.69 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.29
-1.79 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.25

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Photopic log contrast sensitivity by spatial frequency - cycles per degree (CPD), using the Clinical Trial Suite (CTS) from M\&S Technologies (Niles, IL, 129 USA)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clareon Non-toric IOL Implantation
n=20 Eyes
The Clareon aspheric (non-toric) IOL was implanted
Clareon T2 IOL Implantation
n=30 Eyes
Clareon T2 (low cylinder) toric IOL implanted
Photopic Contrast Sensitivity
18 CPD
-0.08 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.78
0.06 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.67
Photopic Contrast Sensitivity
12 CPD
-0.82 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.67
-0.84 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.60
Photopic Contrast Sensitivity
6 CPD
-1.70 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.40
-1.82 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.32
Photopic Contrast Sensitivity
3 CPD
-1.68 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.29
-2.16 log contrast sensitivity
Standard Deviation 0.29

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Low contrast visual acuity (VA), logMAR, 10% contrast, using the Clinical Trial Suite (CTS) from M\&S Technologies (Niles, IL, 129 USA)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clareon Non-toric IOL Implantation
n=20 Eyes
The Clareon aspheric (non-toric) IOL was implanted
Clareon T2 IOL Implantation
n=30 Eyes
Clareon T2 (low cylinder) toric IOL implanted
Low Contrast Visual Acuity
Mesopic no glare
0.62 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.2
0.59 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.2
Low Contrast Visual Acuity
Photopic no glare
.34 logMAR
Standard Deviation .14
.33 logMAR
Standard Deviation .15
Low Contrast Visual Acuity
Photopic glare
1.09 logMAR
Standard Deviation .03
1.06 logMAR
Standard Deviation .09
Low Contrast Visual Acuity
Mesopic with glare
1.10 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.03
1.10 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.02

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Mean refraction, spherical equivalent (MRSE), in diopters

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clareon Non-toric IOL Implantation
n=20 Eyes
The Clareon aspheric (non-toric) IOL was implanted
Clareon T2 IOL Implantation
n=30 Eyes
Clareon T2 (low cylinder) toric IOL implanted
Mean Refraction, Spherical Equivalent (MRSE)
0.47 Dioptres
Standard Deviation 0.55
0.22 Dioptres
Standard Deviation 0.42

Adverse Events

Clareon T2 IOL Implantation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Clareon Non-toric IOL Implantation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Kjell Gunnar Gundersen, MD, PhD

iFocus Eye Clinic

Phone: +4752808900

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place