Different Suture Diameters in Periodontal Plastic Surgery
NCT06698393 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2024-11-21
Summary
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the clinical outcomes of using non-resorbable polyamide sutures of different diameters (3.0 vs. 6.0) for securing an advanced coronary flap (CAF) and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the treatment of RT1 gingival recessions (as classified by Cairo et al.).
Forty patients presenting with at least one RT1 recession will be enrolled in the study. Twenty participants will undergo CAF + SCTG sutured with non-resorbable polyamide thread of 3.0 diameter, while the other 20 participants (control group) will receive the same procedure sutured with a 6.0 diameter thread. The primary outcome, complete root coverage (CRC), will be assessed six months after treatment.
Additional clinical parameters, including gingival recession (GR), clinical attachment level (CAL), pocket depth (PD), keratinized tissue width (KT), keratinized tissue thickness (GT), and Root Coverage Esthetic Score (RES), will be evaluated at baseline and at the six-month follow-up.
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) will also be measured, including the degree of general discomfort (D) experienced, assessed on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, as well as patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction (PRES) and overall treatment satisfaction (OTS), both quantified on a VAS scale from 0 to 10.
Conditions
- Gingival Recession
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Suture 3.0 Group
The extent of the depth of the recession will be reported on the anatomical papillae and, after adding 1 mm, 2 horizontal incisions of approximately 3 mm will be made at the base of the surgical papillae laterally to the recession.Two divergent releasing incisions will be made extending approximately 2-3 mm into the alveolar mucosa.The surgical papillae will be detached in partial thickness. A full thickness dissection will be performed from the bottom of the recession to expose approximately 3mm of the crest bone.A partial thickness dissection will be performed in the most apical portion of the flap until complete passivation of the flap is obtained.The harvesting of the epithelial-connective graft will be performed at the la. The de-epithelialised graft will be sutured at the level of the de-epithelialised anatomical papillae.The flap will be repositioned coronally suturing the anatomical papillae on the surgical ones, using a Non-Resorbable Polyamide Suture of 3.0 Diameter.
- PROCEDURE
-
Suture 6.0 Group
The extent of the depth of the recession will be reported on the anatomical papillae and, after adding 1 mm, 2 horizontal incisions of approximately 3 mm will be made at the base of the surgical papillae laterally to the recession.Two divergent releasing incisions will be made extending approximately 2-3 mm into the alveolar mucosa.The surgical papillae will be detached in partial thickness. A full thickness dissection will be performed from the bottom of the recession to expose approximately 3mm of the crest bone.A partial thickness dissection will be performed in the most apical portion of the flap until complete passivation of the flap is obtained.The harvesting of the epithelial-connective graft will be performed at the la. The de-epithelialised graft will be sutured at the level of the de-epithelialised anatomical papillae.The flap will be repositioned coronally suturing the anatomical papillae on the surgical ones, using a Non-Resorbable Polyamide Suture of 6.0 Diameter.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
G. d'Annunzio University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-05-31
- Completion
- 2025-11-30
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Use of Cyanoacrylate in Healing and Pain in the Palatal Donor Site of Connective Tissue Grafts
NCT06116539 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Analysis of Root Coverage Stability.
NCT05439382 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Collagen Matrix With Tunnel Technique Compared to CTG for the Treatment of Periodontal Recessions
NCT02632240 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Platelet Rich Fibrin vs Sub Epithelial Connective Tissue and Coronally Advanced Flap Alone in Gingival Recession
NCT03712852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Using CAF With Either SCTG and Vitamin C Versus SCTG Alone in Management of RT1 Gingival Recession
NCT04632693 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Depending on the Positioning of the Graft
NCT06366022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Modified Technique for Free Gingival Graft Stabilization Using Titanium Fixation Tacs Around Implants Versus Conventional Suturing Technique
NCT07019428 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Microneedling on Coverage of RT1 Gingival Recession in Thin Phenotype.
NCT06432439 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of (TCAF) Versus (CAF) Combined With Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Multiple RT2 Gingival Recession Sites
NCT07064603 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Suturing Protocols on Coronally Advanced Flap for Root Coverage Outcomes
NCT05472233 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Suturing Technique on Height of Interdental Papilla and Periodontal Healing
NCT03429764 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect Of Microneedling With Coronally Advanced Flap For Management of RT1 Gingival Recession In Thin Gingival Phenotype
NCT06988839 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT04611282 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Root Coverage by Connective Graft and Different Root Conditioning Methods
NCT03095378 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Amnion Chorion Membrane in Comparison to Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Gingival Recession Coverage
NCT02656732 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Growth Factors in the Treatment of the Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05319938 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Morbidity and Coverage Outcome With Connective Tissue Graft Used With Coronally Advanced Flap and Tunneling Technique
NCT02269748 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions on Root Coverage
NCT06438094 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Gingival Recession (RT1) Treatment With Different Gingival Augmentation Surgeries
NCT05688293 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Timing Suture Removal on Root Coverage Procedures
NCT04826653 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Xenogenic Collagen Matrix for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05693753 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Cyanoacrylate as an Alternative to Sutures in Free Gingival Graft Stabilization
NCT06821984 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Peri-implant Soft Tissue Volume Changes at Small Buccal Dehiscences
NCT05466006 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Volume Stable Collagen Matrix in RT2 Gingival Recession Compared to Connective Tissue Graft
NCT05568732 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Modified Laterally Stretched Technique (RT2) Gingival Recession vs Tunneling With CT Grafting
NCT06044870 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA