Adaptive Versus Non-adaptive Radiotherapy and 2 Bladder Filling Instructions for Patients with Intermediate or High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer (ARP)

NCT06678126 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 104

Last updated 2024-11-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study is being done to compare the side effects between two different radiation techniques, standard non-adaptive radiation therapy vs. daily adaptive radiation therapy and also comparing two different bladder filling instructions to find out if customized bladder instructions may lead to better treatment outcomes.

Conditions

Interventions

RADIATION

Prostate and Pelvic Nodes Radiotherapy

60 Gy prostate and 44 Gy pelvic nodes with 20 fractions

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Scott Tyldesley

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-04-30
Primary Completion
2033-06-30
Completion
2035-01-31

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06678126 on ClinicalTrials.gov