MedTrace Logo

Muscle Energy Versus Mulligan Techniques in Treating Patients With Cervical Spondylosis

NCT06664931 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2025-07-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study will be aimed to answer the following questions:

Which technique, MET or MMT, is more effective in reducing pain, increasing range of motion (ROM), improving proprioception, and enhancing functional ability in individuals with CS?

It will be assumed that:

1. All participants will adhere to study instructions and procedures.
2. All participants will be evaluated under standardized conditions.

Conditions

  • Cervical Spondylosis
  • Mulligan Mobilization
  • SNAGs
  • Muscle Energy Technique
  • Post Isometric Relaxation

Interventions

OTHER

Group (A) Muscle Energy Technique (MET)

MET will be applied to three key muscles commonly associated with neck pain: upper trapezius, levator scapulae, and anterior scalenus.

OTHER

Group (B) Mulligan Mobilizations Techniques (MMT).

Participants in Group (B) will receive MMT alongside the traditional treatment. MMT utilizes a specific technique called Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) to improve joint mobilization.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-11-05
Primary Completion
2025-01-01
Completion
2025-02-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06664931 on ClinicalTrials.gov