Comparison of Different Electroporation Systems in the Ablation Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

NCT06646887 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150

Last updated 2025-04-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The participant is invited to participate in a clinical study comparing three different techniques for treating atrial fibrillation (AF) called electroporation systems. Atrial fibrillation is an irregular heartbeat that can cause complications if left untreated. The goal of this study is to determine which electroporation system is the most effective and safest for treating AF. These systems work by using electrical energy to disrupt abnormal heart tissue, helping to restore a normal heart rhythm.

Conditions

  • AF
  • Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Interventions

OTHER

Electroporation

Unlike traditional thermal ablation techniques such as radiofrequency (RF) and cryoablation, the electroporation systems used in this study rely on pulsed electric fields (PEF) to selectively target and ablate cardiac tissue. This non-thermal mechanism reduces the risk of collateral damage to nearby structures, such as the esophagus, phrenic nerve, and coronary arteries.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital Dubrava

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-10-15
Primary Completion
2025-04-10
Completion
2025-05-01

Countries

  • Croatia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06646887 on ClinicalTrials.gov