Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effect of GLP-1 Analogue ROSE-010 on Appetite in Overweight and Obese Subjects (NCT NCT06621017)
NCT ID: NCT06621017
Last Updated: 2026-06-01
Results Overview
The amount of food (weight and energy content) consumed during lunch after administration of ROSE-010 at 2 dose levels compared to placebo.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
40 participants
30 minutes
2026-06-01
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
10
|
15
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
15
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Participants by age group
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
Total
n=40 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • Participants by age group
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • Participants by age group
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants • Participants by age group
|
0 Participants
n=100 Participants • Participants by age group
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
10 Participants
n=24 Participants • Participants by age group
|
15 Participants
n=24 Participants • Participants by age group
|
15 Participants
n=48 Participants • Participants by age group
|
40 Participants
n=100 Participants • Participants by age group
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • Participants by age group
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • Participants by age group
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants • Participants by age group
|
0 Participants
n=100 Participants • Participants by age group
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
10 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=48 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=48 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=48 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
5 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=48 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=48 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 minutesThe amount of food (weight and energy content) consumed during lunch after administration of ROSE-010 at 2 dose levels compared to placebo.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Food Consumption
|
605.5 weight food eaten g
Standard Error 0
|
404.3 weight food eaten g
Standard Error 80.55
|
423.6 weight food eaten g
Standard Error 79.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6.5 hours Day 7Hunger across 6.5 hours of Area Under Evaluation (AUE) defined by time in hours (h) multiplied by the subject reported value on a visual analogue scale at each time point measured in mm on a 0 to 100 mm scale and where 0 is not hungry at all and 100 is maximum hunger. AUE is a sum of hunger across the time period and is calculated as h\*mm. Simplistically, if the subject was not hungry at all across the period the AUE would be zero. The higher the AUE number, the higher the level of hunger throughout the observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Hunger
|
220.5 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 0.0 to 424.3
|
212.5 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 3.5 to 359.8
|
177.1 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 15.2 to 405.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6.5 hours Day 7Satiety across 6.5 hours of Area Under Evaluation (AUE) defined by time in hours (h) multiplied by the subject reported value on a visual analogue scale at each time point measured in mm on a 0 to 100 mm scale and where 0 is not feeling full at at all and 100 is maximum feeling of fullness. AUE is a sum of satiety across the time period and is calculated as h\*mm. Simplistically, if the subject was not full at all across the period the AUE would be zero. The higher the AUE number, the higher the level of satiety throughout the observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Satiety
|
340.3 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 105.9 to 656.0
|
328.1 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 0.0 to 656.0
|
286.6 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 0.0 to 536.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6.5 hours Day 7Prospective consumption across 6.5 hours of Area Under Evaluation (AUE) defined by time in hours (h) multiplied by the subject reported value on a visual analogue scale at each time point measured in mm on a 0 to 100 mm scale and where 0 is indicates no anticipated need to eat and 100 is maximum anticipated need to eat. AUE is a sum of prospective consumption across the time period and is calculated as h\*mm. Simplistically, if the subject has no anticipated need or desire to eat at all across the period the AUE would be zero. The higher the AUE number, the higher the level of prospective consumption throughout the observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Prospective Consumption
|
247.6 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 2.5 to 571.6
|
227.2 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 7.6 to 362.6
|
183.6 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 12.7 to 372.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6.5 hours Day 7Desire to eat across 6.5 hours of Area Under Evaluation (AUE) defined by time in hours (h) multiplied by the subject reported value on a visual analogue scale at each time point measured in mm on a 0 to 100 mm scale and where 0 is no desire to eat at all and 100 is maximum desire to eat. AUE is a sum of the desire to eat across the time period and is calculated as h\*mm. Simplistically, if the subject had no desire to eat at all across the period the AUE would be zero. The higher the AUE number, the higher the desire to eat throughout the observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Desire to Eat
|
223.6 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 0.0 to 508.7
|
219.8 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 4.1 to 357.7
|
166.0 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 3.8 to 372.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 minutes Day 7Palatability (tastiness) score on a visual analogue scale (0 to 100 mm) where 0 is not palatable at all and 100 is the maximum palatibility. The higher the score, the more palatable the reported outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Palatability
|
74.4 Scores on VAS scale
Interval 16.0 to 100.0
|
55.9 Scores on VAS scale
Interval 0.0 to 92.0
|
58.4 Scores on VAS scale
Interval 5.0 to 88.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6.5 hours Day 7Nausea across 6.5 hours of Area Under Evaluation (AUE) defined by time in hours (h) multiplied by the subject reported value on a visual analogue scale at each time point measured in mm on a 0 to 100 mm scale and where 0 is not nauseous at all and 100 is maximum nausea. AUE is a sum of hunger across the time period and is calculated as h\*mm. Simplistically, if the subject was not nauseous at all across the period, the AUE would be zero. The higher the AUE number, the higher the level of nausea throughout the observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nausea
|
0.0 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0.17 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 0.0 to 2.4
|
3.38 AUE defined as h*mm
Interval 0.0 to 41.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 7Population: The placebo group was not analyzed for ROSE-010 PK.
Plasma PK analysis of ROSE-010: Time to max plasma concentration in minutes
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasma PK Analysis of ROSE-010 Time to Max Concentration Tmax
|
—
|
26 Minutes
Interval 20.0 to 45.0
|
26 Minutes
Interval 20.0 to 45.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 7Population: The placebo group were not analyzed for PK
Plasma PK analysis of ROSE-010, measurement of max plasma concentration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasma PK Analysis of ROSE-010 Cmax
|
—
|
0.907 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.257
|
1.06 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.440
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 7Time of plasma elimination half-life calculated for both ROSE-010 doses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
n=15 Participants
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Half-life
|
0 Minutes
Standard Deviation 0
|
34.7 Minutes
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
39.8 Minutes
Standard Deviation 13.4
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
ROSE-010 99 mcg
ROSE-010 150 mcg
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=10 participants at risk
Saline solution
|
ROSE-010 99 mcg
n=15 participants at risk
ROSE-010 solution, 99 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
ROSE-010 150 mcg
n=15 participants at risk
ROSE-010 solution, 150 mcg, 0.5 ml
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • From baseline to the end of follow up, 15 days total. Subjects were discharged from the clinic 24 hours after the final treatment (Day 8) and followed up by telephone for safety assessment after a further 7 days.
Adverse events were collected by clinicians conducting the study
|
60.0%
9/15 • Number of events 18 • From baseline to the end of follow up, 15 days total. Subjects were discharged from the clinic 24 hours after the final treatment (Day 8) and followed up by telephone for safety assessment after a further 7 days.
Adverse events were collected by clinicians conducting the study
|
46.7%
7/15 • Number of events 26 • From baseline to the end of follow up, 15 days total. Subjects were discharged from the clinic 24 hours after the final treatment (Day 8) and followed up by telephone for safety assessment after a further 7 days.
Adverse events were collected by clinicians conducting the study
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorders
|
0.00%
0/10 • From baseline to the end of follow up, 15 days total. Subjects were discharged from the clinic 24 hours after the final treatment (Day 8) and followed up by telephone for safety assessment after a further 7 days.
Adverse events were collected by clinicians conducting the study
|
33.3%
5/15 • Number of events 8 • From baseline to the end of follow up, 15 days total. Subjects were discharged from the clinic 24 hours after the final treatment (Day 8) and followed up by telephone for safety assessment after a further 7 days.
Adverse events were collected by clinicians conducting the study
|
26.7%
4/15 • Number of events 8 • From baseline to the end of follow up, 15 days total. Subjects were discharged from the clinic 24 hours after the final treatment (Day 8) and followed up by telephone for safety assessment after a further 7 days.
Adverse events were collected by clinicians conducting the study
|
|
General disorders
general disorders and administration site conditions
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to the end of follow up, 15 days total. Subjects were discharged from the clinic 24 hours after the final treatment (Day 8) and followed up by telephone for safety assessment after a further 7 days.
Adverse events were collected by clinicians conducting the study
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • From baseline to the end of follow up, 15 days total. Subjects were discharged from the clinic 24 hours after the final treatment (Day 8) and followed up by telephone for safety assessment after a further 7 days.
Adverse events were collected by clinicians conducting the study
|
0.00%
0/15 • From baseline to the end of follow up, 15 days total. Subjects were discharged from the clinic 24 hours after the final treatment (Day 8) and followed up by telephone for safety assessment after a further 7 days.
Adverse events were collected by clinicians conducting the study
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place