MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Implant Stability of Hybrid Versus Resorbable Blast Media (RBM) Surfaces Using Resonance Frequency Analysis

NCT06620315 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2024-10-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

• To compare primary stability (during initial loading of implant) and secondary stability (after 12 weeks of implant loading) which are denoted as ISQ value of Hybrid (DIO UFII) versus Resorbable blast media (RBM) (Osstem TSII) implant surfaces.

Conditions

  • Implant Complication
  • IMPANT STABILITY

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCT

RBM

Resorbable Blast Media (RBM) implant surfaces can enhance osseointegration and implant stability

COMBINATION_PRODUCT

sand blasted implant

sand blasted implant

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-01-01
Primary Completion
2024-01-01
Completion
2024-03-01
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06620315 on ClinicalTrials.gov