Patient Satisfaction and Cosmetic Outcomes in Adhesive Strip Versus Suture Repair for Simple Facial Lacerations
NCT06550999 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 62
Last updated 2026-02-12
Summary
There are a variety of techniques utilized to close lacerations, including but not limited to, traditional sutures, staples, adhesive strips, and skin glue. While closing open wounds and preventing infection are the primary goals of laceration repair, physicians are also concerned with minimizing scar formation and providing the best cosmetic outcomes for the patient. Specifically, the skin on the face is a sensitive area where cosmetic outcome is of high importance, and several laceration repair techniques have been devised for closing facial wounds.
Sutures have traditionally been used to close wounds in various types of tissue, and it is still very commonly used in the clinical setting. Adhesive strips (also known under the brand names of Steri-Strips, Curi-strips, Nichi-Strips, and Suture Strips) are another method to repair lacerations superficially. Due to their superficial application and ease of use, adhesive strips may help minimize scar formation and may result in less pain and complications for the patient when compared to conventional sutures.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine whether repair of small, simple facial lacerations with adhesive strips results in better patient experiences and better cosmetic outcomes than sutures. The investigators hypothesize that wounds repaired with adhesive strip will have higher patient satisfaction scores and better cosmetic outcomes.
Conditions
- Facial Laceration
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laceration repair with sutures
Repair of the patient's facial laceration with sutures
- DEVICE
-
Laceration repair with adhesive strips
Repair of the patient's facial laceration with adhesive strips
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of California, Irvine
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jeffry Nahmias, M.D. · University of California, Irvine
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2028-05-31
- Completion
- 2028-05-31
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Dermal Suturing Only Versus Layered Cutaneous Closure
NCT02383186 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate With Full-thickness Skin Grafts
NCT02550574 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Outcome of Tie-over Bolster Application in Surgical Wounds
NCT05758168 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmetic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Facial Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department
NCT01514084 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Zip Device to Conventional Sutures for Laceration Repair in Pediatrics in an Emergency Department
NCT04122859 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Post-Market Study of BandGrip in Traumatic Wound Closure Compared to Suture
NCT03628690 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmetic Outcome at 4 Months in Hand and Feet Lacerations in Children: Conservative Versus Suture Repair
NCT03321721 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Silicone Taping for the Improvement of Abdominal Donor Site Scars
NCT04506255 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Traditional Superficial Cutaneous Sutures Versus Steri-Strip Coaptive Film in Layered Dermatologic Closures
NCT01938586 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Study Into the Cosmetic Results of Leukosan Adhesive
NCT02179723 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Absorbable Suture Versus Tissue Glue to Repair Defects Following Mohs Surgery
NCT01298167 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Suture Repair of Lacerations in the ED: Comparison Between Two Suture Materials
NCT05281666 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Scar Resection and Reconstruction With Integra and Split Skin Grafts in Patients With Non-Suicidal Self-Inflicted Scars
NCT04420442 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long-Term Outcome of Pediatric Traumatic Wound Repair: Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive
NCT03080467 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars or Keloids
NCT00849004 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing 1 Week Versus 2 Week Cutaneous Suture Removal
NCT05267002 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tap Water Versus Normal Saline for Wound Irrigation
NCT01564342 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of microMend® Devices to Sutures in Closing Lacerations in Children
NCT04557761 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing Cosmetic Outcomes of Pediatric Laceration Closure Using Skin Glue, Medical Tape Versus Stitches
NCT03280628 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness Study of MIST Therapy Versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
NCT01200563 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Split Scar Study to Assess Cosmetic Outcome From Differing Suture Spacing
NCT03284983 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of microMend Device to Close Lacerations
NCT03830515 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Length Gain Between Square Flap and Z-plasty in Post Burn Contracture Release
NCT04690543 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cutaneous Scarring of Scalpel Versus Cautery
NCT00803140 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Closure of Skin Incision Using CO2 Laser
NCT02149979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1