MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Combination of Proximal ACB and iPACK With Large-Volume Distal ACB for Early Mobilization After TKR

NCT06525493 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2024-07-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Large-volume distal ACB is not superior to combination of proximal ACB and iPACK in facilitating early mobilization after TKR. Block performing time of distal ACB was significantly shorter compared to the combination of proximal ACB and iPACK

Conditions

  • Adductor Canal Block
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Regional Anesthesia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Regional Anesthesia

The interventions are three different regional anesthesia techniques: Proximal Adductor Canal Block (ACB), iPACK (Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee), and Large-Volume Distal Adductor Canal Block (Large ACB distal). all three interventions were administered using ropivacaine 0.2%. However, there were differences in the volumes injected for each regional anesthesia technique. Proximal ACB: 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%. iPACK: 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%. Large ACB distal: 35 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Indonesia University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-06-01
Primary Completion
2023-12-01
Completion
2024-01-01

Countries

  • Indonesia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06525493 on ClinicalTrials.gov