PEMT Versus WBV on Quadriceps Strength Post Burn

NCT06525103 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2024-10-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate which is more effective pulsed electromagnetic field therapy or whole-body vibration on quadriceps strength after chronic burn.

Conditions

  • Burns of Thigh

Interventions

DEVICE

electromagnitic field therapy

EMSCULPT device (BTL Industries Inc., Boston, MA) based on HIFEM technology. * Frequency : 50 or 60 Hz. * Intenisty: 0-100 .Input voltage: 230 V

DEVICE

whole body vibration

Crazy fit machine. * Input voltage:220 V. * Frequency : 30 Hz. * Maximum power: 1500W. * Intensity:1 to 50 levels.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
25 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-10-18
Primary Completion
2024-11-30
Completion
2024-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06525103 on ClinicalTrials.gov