Dry Needling Versus Percutaneous Electrolysis in Lumbar Multifidus Muscles in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

NCT06505161 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2024-07-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the reduction of pain of two different treatments in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients were divided in two groups. The control group will receive DN treatment, and the experimental group will receive PE, both in the lumbar multifidus muscles.

Conditions

  • Chronic Low-back Pain

Interventions

OTHER

Dry needling

It consists in application of dry needling on active and/or latent TPs in low back multifidus muscles

OTHER

Percutaneous electrolysis

It consists in the application of intratissue percutaneous electrolysis with galvanic current as a cathodic flow electrode in the low back multifidus muscles. The intervention will be guided by ultrasound equipment medically certified.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Alcala

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Leire Lopez de Calle Sánchez, Grade · University of Alcala

  • Samuel Fernandez Carnero, PhD · University of Alcala

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
30 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-09-01
Primary Completion
2025-06-01
Completion
2025-07-01

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06505161 on ClinicalTrials.gov