MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Lathe Cut Versus Cast Molding Soft Contact Lens Technique on Ocular Surface Integrity

NCT06495112 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 69

Last updated 2024-07-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

"Comparison between Lathe Cut versus Cast Molding Soft Contact Lens Technique on Ocular Surface Integrity" investigates the impact of two different manufacturing methods on the health and integrity of the ocular surface.

Conditions

  • Ocular Surface Disease

Interventions

OTHER

Soft contact lens with lathe cut technique Lathe

athe cut technique Lathe cutting involves shaping a solid block of lens material into the desired form using precision machinery. This method allows for customized lens designs but may result in a less smooth surface compared to cast molding. Cast molding, on the other hand, uses a liquid monomer that is cured in a mold to form the lens. This technique typically results in a smoother and more uniform lens surface.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Soft contact lens with cast molding technique

Participants in this arm would receive Cast molding soft contact lenses and would wear them according to the study protocol, also likely for a specified duration.The cast molding technique for soft contact lenses involves creating lenses by polymerizing a liquid monomer mixture within a mold that forms the desired lens shape. Here's a brief overview of the steps involved in the cast molding process

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Superior University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
15 Years
Max Age
35 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-11-01
Primary Completion
2024-05-01
Completion
2024-09-30

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06495112 on ClinicalTrials.gov